Subject:
|
Re: New Website Design Test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 02:09:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
970 times
|
| |
|
|
"Anthony Sava" <ajs0093@pop.tamu.edu> writes:
> In my own defense, I know perfectly well how to prevent any navigation/frame
> errors with links. I also know how to break out of frames and start new
> browser windows.
That's good. I don't! I just know it bugs me when the folks who use frames
get it worng. I hadn't intended my comments as a direct attack on you or
your new page style - my apologies if it came across that way. In fact,
I *like* the look of your pages, both forms. I just dislike frames.
> I do have my links at the top of every page, however, I have so many pages that
> my buttons get very cumbersome to have on each.
<grin> I "solved" that by just using text links.
> If I may play devil's advocate, I will have over 15 pages after my next update
> to my page. Frames is a *wonderful* way of being able to update links without
> having to go into every - single - page - which believe you me, isn't
> fun. With frames, I'll be able to update one page, and everything will be
> done. I'm still playing with a vertical frame set, but I have not decided how
> to do that one yet, I have so many pages, that my buttons, at least in their
> present state, might take up a good quarter of the page, if i have them all
> viewable at the same time. Perhaps I will come up with better, smaller
> buttons, but for now, their all I have.
I understand that need. Since getting my digital camera a couple of years
ago, I've put up far too many pages of pointless pictures of trees (that's
the way some friends have described them!). My solution was a truly awful,
geeky one: I wrote some C programs that take simplified descriptions and
emit the HTML for the pages (plus making the thumbnails, and finding
the file sizes). If I change my navigation structure, I have to go edit
the C source files, recompile, and then go rebuild all of my pages from
the unchanged description files.
I've heard there is something called "server side includes" that sounds
like it ought to solve this problem, but I don't know any more than that.
--
Don't design inefficiency in - it'll happen in the implementation.
Chris Gray cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA
http://www.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA/cg/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Website Design Test
|
| (...) if (...) frame, (...) be a (...) In my own defense, I know perfectly well how to prevent any navigation/frame errors with links. I also know how to break out of frames and start new browser windows. (...) I do have my links at the top of every (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
