Subject:
|
Re: Question on the IOM
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 May 2002 01:02:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1586 times
|
| |
|
|
Matt,
I think your concept sounds like it could be fun. Why don't you start a
website and run it?
-Aaron
"Matt Hein" <Pyrokid17@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Gwq9yA.983@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Slavick Mikhaylov writes:
> > I think that the Isle Of Mist should continue. It would be bad if it just
> > stopped right at the begining. Maybe new people are needed. I am now • taking
> > pictures of my "sig-fig" and working on how he can get to the Isle.
> > Off-topic but: will the creatures that use magic as "life-support" or
> > creatures that are made out of raw magic be able to live on the Isle?
>
> Perhaps a lot more than people are needed for IOM to continue? I • personally
> think more effort should be placed in the real-time scenerio compendium,
> an addition I proposed earlier, but nobody seemed to like (for some
> reason I don't know of)
>
> To tell you the truth, I don't really observe so called "fantasy magic"
> rules, because, in essence, none of my characters (that I'm working on) • use
> magic. (instead, they utilize chi skills and such, which are vaguely
> similar to magic) However, I would think that IOM wouldn't allow for
> life-support magic, because that would make it way too easy to go about • the
> game, in sense,making it a tad boring for me.
>
> In a sense, I doubt magic creatures would become denizens of the isle.
>
> Yes, I would be a misfortune to see the IOM cease to exist, but say, if it
> did, this would probably make way for a better improved version (which
> works by the scenerio basis, and of course, a twist of your own • storyline.)
>
> Just an opinion of mine...
>
> <<_Matt Hein_>>
> Lugnet No. 1112
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question on the IOM
|
| (...) I joined IOM at about the same time that it died down, so my character is not even posted on the website. I think this project needs not only more people but more webmasters who can stand the "long-termity" of the project. Personally, if IOM (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Question on the IOM
|
| (...) Perhaps a lot more than people are needed for IOM to continue? I personally think more effort should be placed in the real-time scenerio compendium, an addition I proposed earlier, but nobody seemed to like (for some reason I don't know of) To (...) (22 years ago, 26-May-02, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
