|
|
 | | Re: The NEW Castle World!
|
| Although I am not an especially prominent member on Lugnet, I would like to state that a new Castle World would be something I would full-heartedly support! Whatever may come of this discussion, I would be willing to help the new site in any way I (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The NEW Castle World!
|
| Do you object to maintaining the archive as a completely separate link from the new site? If yes, why should it disappear? Just because people are now long absent, doesn't mean that their existing contributions aren't worth preserving in some way. I (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The NEW Castle World!
|
| (...) I have no problem with the idea of keeping the old website in tact, but all it is at the moment is a museum for the days gone by anyway. (...) I mean no disrespect, and I'm sure that Craig is a great artist, but so what? IOM never revealed (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
| | | | | The NEW Castle World!
|
| I declare this subject now open to discussion. Please post all of your thoughts on the subject here in this newsgroup. Noise or not, this is our home. Nothing is sacred, everything is permitted. I propose: 1. That we maintain the former Castle World (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
| | | | | Re: CastleWorld Website (was re: CBG)
|
| (...) I only want to preserve the existing CW as an archive, that's all. (...) No compromise is necessary, we could start from scratch. It could be totally revamped -- a NEW Castle World. (...) Yeah, I have to agree. (...) Two problems here: a) we (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
|
