 | | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) Well I thank you for initiating the ‘top 3’ Castle choices for us!!! ``Just one question, Will you tally up the votes at the end?`` Also, Maggie Cambron wrote: (...) I only like Pirate cause its really good to supplement Castle. All other (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
|
|
(...) I don't think so. See below. (...) True. (...) I don't think so. See below. (...) While most of the above may be *true*, it is not the *reason* that this set is being released to S@H and not to retail. The REASON is that S@H is within Brad's (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) You and Lindsay both mentioned this, and I want to point out that I agree with it, although I imagine it certainly didn't look like it. I don't (intentionally) deride or begrudge collectors and speculators their place in the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
|
|
(...) I disagree with that. :-) To me anyway, it DID look like you agreed (in advance) with what we advanced... (1). It's those other blokes over there we are arguing with, not you, bub. :-) (...) Right on. (...) Currency speculating again? :-) 1 - (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) LOL! If they need help coming back, I've got a little belville crown that fits perfectly on a certain plastic frog... (got it from Craig)... but who's volunteering to kiss a couple of Richards, and in the shape of frogs no less? They're very (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Are we? or are some of us builders? (was: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!)
|
|
(...) Absract. There are different words we apply to different approaches to LEGO(products). Builders and collectors. Builders might feel that collectors have an unproductive/unhelpful view of LEGO(products). Builders don't care about scalpers and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
|
I think LEGOs differ greatly from other items that people collect because it is a toy, a tool and an art medium. So, because LEGOs are different, I think the types of "collectors" are different. * There's the traditional LEGO collector who buys and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
|
|
(...) Where did you get these *facts* from? If what you say is true, the running of LEGO is far worse than I thought. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
|
Hello! (...) Exactly this is what I am. I collect sets. I try to get as many complete sets as I can get. But! I use the bricks of my (complete) sets and build my own creations. There ain't any models complete assambled in my showcase. Even my (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
"Kevin Knoot" <kevin-knoot@uiowa.edu> wrote in message news:GEs605.777@lugnet.com... (...) thought (...) offering ------8< Snip Ugh, had to think hard about this one and can get it down to 4, assuming Sets I'd like to see make a comeback as opposed (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) Aw, gee, Richard, I hope you didn't think I was criticizing your selection of the pirate theme! You certainly needn't defend your choice to me! I like it too, as you say it has some useful pieces that can lend themselves to other themes. And I (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Maggie Cambron writes: I think you may win the award for Most Ground Covered in the least space in a single post. Yeesh, I'm reeling from conversational whiplash! Dave! FUT, if necessary, to OT.FUN (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) If it's current molds then they would most likely be used for a set anyways, if its a stored mold, they don't seem to be making money from it unless they use it :^), if it is a new mold (for old parts) then maybe what you are saying is true. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) For Forestmen rereleases, I'd *love* it if the "tree" parts (most, but not all, the black pieces) were changed to brown. That would make my day. :) Jeff (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) Great idea - I'll make it one of my choices. 6085 - Black Monarch's Castle - great design - great minifigs. 725 - yeah not a castle set, but I can't build a single MOC without using elements that were available in 725. (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
"Ed "Boxer" Jones" <edboxer@aol.com> wrote in message news:GEu02G.92p@lugnet.com... (...) sets(under (...) Since (...) one (...) I have to throw my $0.02 in for 725 ((URL) I love the Basic building sets, 725 in particular. The LUGNET Guide doesn't (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) Which 725 is that? There are three listed in the lugnet DB... -Shiri (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) Basic Building Set 725 (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
|
(...) They must have sold for around $27. I remember buying them for around $20 when Woolworth's would have 25% off all Lego sales. (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes: <snip> I assume (...) No you're not! ;-) And Tammy, by the looks of it, you didn't kill this thread either. Now it's my turn. /\/\ark - watching the 3724 watching him - de Kock (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
