To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 9458
9457  |  9459
Subject: 
Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:36:38 GMT
Viewed: 
2275 times
  
In lugnet.castle, James Brown writes:
> You and Lindsay both mentioned this, and I want to point out that I agree
> with it, although I imagine it certainly didn't look like it.

I disagree with that. :-) To me anyway, it DID look like you agreed (in
advance) with what we advanced... (1). It's those other blokes over there we
are arguing with, not you, bub. :-)

> I don't
> (intentionally) deride or begrudge collectors and speculators their place in
> the market; I think it makes the market better.  I just feel very strongly
> that speculators have no basis whinging that the commodity they speculate
> became readily available, and they lost out.  It's part of the deal, live
> with it, or don't speculate.  It happens when new gold mines get found, it
> happens when Lego rereleases old sets.

Right on.

> $0.02 (any takers?  It might be 4 cents tomorrow, that's 100% profit!)

Currency speculating again? :-)

1 - Was that clear? It was?!!? Drat. I'll have to reword it. :-)

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
 
(...) <snip> (...) You and Lindsay both mentioned this, and I want to point out that I agree with it, although I imagine it certainly didn't look like it. I don't (intentionally) deride or begrudge collectors and speculators their place in the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

24 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR