Subject:
|
Re: The legend died
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:05:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
850 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello!
> LEGO is not a collector's item, like Beanie Babies or Elvis commemorative plates.
Of course it is! Why do you think would anybody sell $200 to get a
#6067? To complete their collection only. If you want to play you can
build way better MOCs! You don't need a set that costs several hundreds
$$.
> It is a toy, meant to be played with, not sitting MISB in someone's
> closet accumulating value.
I couldn't agree more!
I for myself don't care much about the value. But I like rare sets
though. Simply for "having" them :-)
> And let's remember who LEGO's real target is: not us, but children.
> How many parents do you think were slapping down $200 for an eBay Guarded Inn for their kid?
No need! They can order parts in bulk at S@H and the kid builds his own
Inn. Remember: It's a construction toy ;-)
And: Children ain't the only target of LEGO's marketing strategy any
more. Newadays there are many sets that are constructed for us Adult
Fans of LEGO. And so are the "Legends". I generally appreciate this
development but not at all.
Bye
Jojo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
|
| (...) LEGO is not a collector's item, like Beanie Babies or Elvis commemorative plates. It is a toy, meant to be played with, not sitting MISB in someone's closet accumulating value. Anything that LEGO does to make a great set more available is an (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
