 | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure it isn't Gail Storm. The eyse are different. (...) It doesn't appear to be form fitting armor. It *is* a shweet new Plate Mail design, though. There may be an opening showing off some of her cleavage, but it could just as (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) Hmm. I can't tell. Dr. Kilroy is hoarding all the magnifying glasses. It would be cool to get another face based on the "pouty lips" face (there are two, right? The Pirate Wench/Islander Babe face, and the Ice Planet Babe face). But it doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) the (...) face). (...) -- (...) but (...) like (...) build a (...) You's guy's must live in the Bermuda Triangle where all the new stuff mysteriously goes, We ain't got nuttin' down here in the South. I am tired of tipping boxes to see the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) the (...) Everytime someone uses that name, I think of a robot from Secret of Mana. Anyone else? No? 'Kay, guess I'm just wierd... :) (...) Definitely. As far as I know, yes, those are the only two. (...) Yeah, yer right! Cool, actual female (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) are (...) People, she is just wearing a *tight* blue dress, nooo armor (she's got cleavage!) with a shawl (spelling?) or sweatery thing over her shoulders. She ain't no warrior chick. Aaron>maniac@vol.com (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) Look at the knight by the ramp up to the gate. It's a she. You can tell by the obviously red lips. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) I got lucky - I came across a Snowspeeder in Wal-Mart which was opened, but complete. Otherwise, I'd still be 2000-catalog-less. Steve (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
|
(...) Perhaps you have a larger picture than I do, but I have to say that the only female I see is on the top of the tower of 6091. The knight by the gate shows no obvious female characteristics. In fact, with that style helm on, how can you say for (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) armor'! :):) (...) Mail (...) I think they're talking about a different girl - they think there are two girls - the "princess", AND a warrior-girl. I'm not so sure - I don't have the catalog with me, and the one at brickshelf isn't clear (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
|
(...) My Reasons (may not be enough for you, though): A. I own The Catalog; B. I looked at it under magnification; C. If that is a Mustache, the knight has no mouth and a very long face; D. It looks an awful lot like the Pirate Wench's Head; E. The (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
|
(...) And we all know that only girls have eyelashes. *laugh* (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
|
(...) shows (...) red (...) minute (...) You seem quite proud of yourself (and quick to temper), Ok, I know now that I was wrong, cause I have SEEN it. I did not wish to offend (no need to get riled), just wished to make a statement from opinion and (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight--not a woman)
|
|
(...) <Snipped my stuff> (...) Ack! I should've realized that sounded angry and arrogant, I apologize. I didn't *mean* for it to sound that way, in fact I wasn't very angry at all. I just wanted to plainly state why I believed what I did. After I (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
