Subject:
|
Re: Harry Potter Figures
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:32:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1010 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Leah Cardaci writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Aaron West writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Nick Cameron writes:
> > > > Does anyone have any thoughts of what the harry potter figures look like. I
> > > > have some ideas, but am pretty clueless about making a Voldamort from the • first
> > > > book. Mabey they'll actually print on both sides of a head.
> > > >
> > > > NICK #:^O
> > >
> > > Purple cloaks and BROOMSTICKS! Finally, I have a use for all of those
> > > things! Wands, cauldrons, Beleville Frogs, Cats, Owls (white!), wizard hats
> > > in many colors, a turban(!) brooms, Beleville Books, Beleville Trunks, an
> > > Ogre, a three-headed dog (Cerebus?), Unicorns, a Dragon, Centaurs (!) and
> > > adult and smaller sized child mini-figures. That's the short list. The • long
> > > list includes all the Beleville Food items and many colors such as the
> > > Beleville Fairy Tale line (can you tell that I think that stuff has
> > > potetial?). Figures should revolve around the main kids in the book with • the
> > > teachers secondary, monsters thirdly. I suspect a Quiditch field, Hogwart's
> > > Castle, and a few adventure and accessory sets are in the works. Hopefully
> > > they will be connectable and expandable without too many Potters!
> > >
> > > The Voldemort figure was only the back of a head for an already existing
> > > character (perhaps a trap-door kind of thing on the back of his hat or
> > > something similar to the Pirate head-cloth that hangs lower on the • backside--
> > > just turn it around).
> > >
> > > Bye!
> > > Aaron :o)
> >
> > The sets won't be really based on the books, per se, unless the movies stick
> > to the books (I wouldn't know, haven't read them). The official press • release
> > says that the toys will be "based on the first two Harry Potter movies".
> > Click here to see the official release-
> > http://www.lego.com/info/pressspecific.asp?PressReleaseId=111&Year=2000 . • Any
> > excuse to have more fantasy type elements is good news to me, though. =)
> >
> > ~Nathan
>
> What do you think of the possibility the Harry Potter line might replace
> Castle the same way that Star Wars has replaced Space? I don't really know
> enough about the Harry Potter books/movies to tell if that would be a problem,
> but I'd much rather have two lines of sets with castle/fantasy elements than
> one.
>
> Just imagine having Castle, Harry Potter, Star Wars, and Belville to get
> parts from! :-)
>
> -L
Good for parts, bad for selection of medieval accessories. If Potter replaces
Castle entirely (better not) then you can kiss Knight's Helms, Swords, Spears,
Lances, Battle Axes, Bows & Arrows, Shields, Crossbows and everything else for
your European Castle elements for minifigs GOODBYE. There is no room for any
classic/historical Castle (i.e. minifig) elements in a Potter world. I hope
that Potter exists separate from Castle (perhaps they WILL do a Lord of the
Rings line too) like Time Cruisers and Beleville. If they ever mix, it should
be up to the kids and AFOLs to mix 'em.
Keep Castle Classic and bring on the Potters!
Aaron :o)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Harry Potter Figures
|
| (...) What do you think of the possibility the Harry Potter line might replace Castle the same way that Star Wars has replaced Space? I don't really know enough about the Harry Potter books/movies to tell if that would be a problem, but I'd much (...) (24 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
