| | The Chicago Bulls Shields
|
|
Looks like it to me. Will there be Jordan and Pippin minfigs? (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
|
(...) If you mean the tower elements from 5808 (which is Scala, not Belville) shown here: (URL) then no, they aren't. The Scala piece is much larger - something like 6x6x12 (probably wrong - I haven't actually measured it), whereas the new castle (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: The Chicago Bulls Shields
|
|
(...) Actuallly, it reminds of an old friend in the SCA, Duke Martin the Temperate, KSCA, &c. His major charge was a bull's head erased in -quite- similar colurs. One wonders....... Cheers, Roger (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
|
(...) Well, they both represent Fuedal periods in their respective cultures, and I assume that is why they are "Castle" sets. When you said "era", did you mean that they were both fuedal, or that they existed at the same time? If the latter, you're (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) to (...) be (...) in (...) no (...) I have to stand by my earlier statement: you may not like, it may not be compatible with euro-castles, but Castles it is, nevertheless. My son doesn't particularly care about compatiblity, in any case (the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: I feel like a junkie!
|
|
(...) Just from looking at the scans I'd say I will get at least one of everything except maybe the MF, the MF is EXPENSIVE. I'm more likely to get a higher quanity of the 7155 (ATT) just because it looks cool and has a TON of tan, so a couple to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) the Adventurers at the moment - he just saw (THE) latest resurrection of The Mummy). (...) My brain is faster than my fingers, which seem to skip words on their own to keep up. :-( Bruce (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hmm, I missed those before, they definitely look tan and appear to be in 6094 and 6095 in addition to the 6091. Mike (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
|
(...) No, it is Belville. TLG calls it Belville, and the 'figs are Belville Figs. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
| | Re: Did anyone else notice...?
|
|
(...) Whups! You're right. The page before is Scala, though, and that's what I used as a reference. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! It's a moot point for me, really, since neither Belville nor Scala are available in Canada. James (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|