Subject:
|
Re: Castle side bar Complaint
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:12:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1154 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Leonard Hoffman writes:
> > > Hey Alex, It's okay, it's gonna be a nice day... Hey, I think you have
> > > touched on this before, that CQ is not a wargame, nor really an RPG. But I
> > > think the question needs asking: What would you call it?
> > >
> > > What I mean is, if you would prefer not to call it this or that, then
> > > perhaps you should suggest to people what indeed they should refer to it as
> > > when describing it briefly (one sentence) to outsiders or newbies.
> >
> > I know, that was a major cross grain in what my complaint. ( i try not to make
> > a problem about what i dont have the solution for.)
> >
> > However, i will stick by the fact it is not a wargame.
> >
> > What would you guys call the IOM, for what it was? whatever that is, it would
> > fit with CQ...
>
> Although I was never really apart of IOM (one of the johnny-come-late peeps), I
> would call it a "RPG-Exploration Game." People 'role-played' (created their
> characters and the characters interacted with eachother). 'Exploration' because
> it was primarily about exploring the Isle of Mist, trying to find whatever it
> was that pulled people there (as opposed to combat like Bricks War, or whatever
> LEGO Wars, short version is now). And 'game' because it was all in fun.
>
> Now, about CQ, you've said it is not a wargame, nor a RPG, nor a 'game'. I'm
> sorry, but I'm not really sure what CQ is, and to be honest, I'm really curious
> about it.
well, ill resign it to as you have put it above, a RPG exploration game. im
sorry for the confusion. (i was rather confused myself!)
But, i dont see how the IOM was a RPG. and, just because it is fun, i dont see
how IOM falls under "game"
I have not gotten any time at all the past three days to even post on here,
much less to CQ. but, ittle be coming soon.
so, yeah, CQ can be a RPG. concidering as it has a gamemaster, and only role
playing games (well, some others do) have gamemasters.
however, people keep getting confused about CQ being a WARGAME. just because it
has combat IN it, means that it has to be a wargame? to me, it would not be as
fun if all you did was stake out land.
you have to Protect yourself, your company, and your towns and citys from
gnomes, goblins and trolls, along with a bunch of other things like wild men
etc.
But, it is not combat based!
Aramir
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Castle side bar Complaint
|
| (...) Although I was never really apart of IOM (one of the johnny-come-late peeps), I would call it a "RPG-Exploration Game." People 'role-played' (created their characters and the characters interacted with eachother). 'Exploration' because it was (...) (21 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
