To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 15023
15022  |  15024
Subject: 
Re: M. Marketplace standard question...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 05:11:49 GMT
Viewed: 
2001 times
  
My thoughts exactly.  Good job, Erick.

Josh

In lugnet.castle, Erick Jensen writes:
> I think the general answer in the MM for unanswered questions is, you figure
> it out.  If your over hang needs to be big, go ahead.  As for a rear
> overhang, do you EVER plan on putting anything behind it?  If so, you really
> can't put anything back there.  I think the idea about restricting overhangs
> is because, if you put 2 face to face, and have large over hangs they'll hit
> or touch or look dumb.  Just think realisim, would a real shop have an
> overhang that's only 2 feet off the ground, or be larger than the building
> itself.  So unless Jeremy or the others wants to correct me here, I say to
> all untouched MM questions (those not covered on the website) do it, if it
> looks nice, then it works, if not, we'll not do it again.  The point of the
> restrictions is to NOT restrict.
> 
> 
> e.
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: M. Marketplace standard question...
 
I think the general answer in the MM for unanswered questions is, you figure it out. If your over hang needs to be big, go ahead. As for a rear overhang, do you EVER plan on putting anything behind it? If so, you really can't put anything back (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.castle)

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR