Subject:
|
Re: M. Marketplace standard question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 05:11:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
735 times
|
| |
|
|
My thoughts exactly. Good job, Erick.
Josh
In lugnet.castle, Erick Jensen writes:
> I think the general answer in the MM for unanswered questions is, you figure
> it out. If your over hang needs to be big, go ahead. As for a rear
> overhang, do you EVER plan on putting anything behind it? If so, you really
> can't put anything back there. I think the idea about restricting overhangs
> is because, if you put 2 face to face, and have large over hangs they'll hit
> or touch or look dumb. Just think realisim, would a real shop have an
> overhang that's only 2 feet off the ground, or be larger than the building
> itself. So unless Jeremy or the others wants to correct me here, I say to
> all untouched MM questions (those not covered on the website) do it, if it
> looks nice, then it works, if not, we'll not do it again. The point of the
> restrictions is to NOT restrict.
>
>
> e.
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: M. Marketplace standard question...
|
| I think the general answer in the MM for unanswered questions is, you figure it out. If your over hang needs to be big, go ahead. As for a rear overhang, do you EVER plan on putting anything behind it? If so, you really can't put anything back (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
