 | | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
(...) Roboforce, Star Wars, and Wild West ("Indian") minifigs also have printing on their legs. Both Spyrius and Islander were introduced in 1994, so I think they share the honor of being first to introduce decorated legs. I suppose it's going to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
Nephilim wrote in message ... (...) bother (...) I see. If I would open these things I would know, but if its not Castle, then what's the point?! -- Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Scans of new Minifigs
|
|
Does anyone out there have any scans of the Castle minifigs. Even pictures from the instructions on how to build the minifigs is fine (you know, the first part of the instructions that you see)Please email pics if you have them. Thanks, K@RL (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
(...) Heh. See, I'm theme-polyamorous, or something like that (i.e. a theme slut). Castle is one of my main squeezes, though. -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily" (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) Provocative? (...) There was a paradisa babe (or a townie, in any event) with visibly defined sexual characteristics (breasts) printed on her. A yellow torso printed with a red swimsuit-looking top. LEGO's been making figures with visibly (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
(...) However, I do believe that the new castle sets are the first to feature printing on the *waist*! They actually have the belt buckle printed where it's SUPPOSED to be now.... Which means unfortunately if you put a new waist together with an old (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
|
An oddity- I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that it was 6091, I got (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) I thought the "red space" was a robe or cloak... Jeff (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
|
Thanks for pointing it out. I kept thinking it was 6098, because thats what the instructions said. I didn't really pay attention to the box. Mismatched numbers. Wonder how long it will take them to figure that out?! If they read Lugnet, like they (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
|
(...) I think I'd "prefer" 6098... The catalog lists it as 6091, as does the box... and I THINK when the 2000 sets were listed on TLC's site it was listed as 6091... but who knows... Maybe they got some sense when they were printing up the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
