|
|
 | | Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?)
|
| (...) Well, I found both of those charts off of google, so i don't know which one is more accurate. At the risk of confusing things even more, I found another page with a similar test: (URL). I believe this one is accurate, since he give the formula (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?
|
| (...) Hi, I agree with you that the viewangle has a big influence on the picture if you use a TFT. As a result of this I think it doesn't matter how I finetune my TFT or grafic card settings. I have no real chance to fix the viewangle... hmm maybe (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | Re: NEW ANIMATION
|
| (...) Yes. This might sound a bit controversial, because a) Wax is new and unknown and b) because it is really more of a video composer than a 3D program. But my guess is that it will allow you to burn through the first stages in computer animation (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?)
|
| So why does my monitor come in at about 1.7 on the first chart, and 2.4 on the second? I'll accept that the second makes it far easier to find the best match, but I won't accept that my estimate is off by 0.7 on the first chart. There's absolutely (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
| | | | | Re: NEW ANIMATION
|
| (...) Thanks, So what your saying is use "Wax" if your a new to animation like me? Also about that program you are writing, I would like a to try it (When it hits the streets). :-D Thanks again, Jason Tiller (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
