 | | Re: Walker from 8891 Animated
|
|
(...) That is way cool! I realy would be interested in see the POV/INI file. -Orion (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Walker from 8891 Animated
|
|
AWESOME I like the shutter of the camera. How about some more. Steve (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Walker from 8891 Animated
|
|
Well... 8 years ago I didn't own enough parts to build it... Now I do! (virtually, but who cares?) The Facts: -20 Frames 640x480 packed in flashanimation -5 hours and 6 pages (A4) for the trigonometric equations -I used Ldraw for designing and (...) (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) I wasn't able to pull it off. The ifpov and ifnotpov insert their own if/else statements into the .pov file, itself. They break the if/else statements that I'm trying to create. (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) Oh. I thought you were talking about overlapping walls. I also just remembered that I had used an earlier version of LDBoxer, that replaced bricks regardless of position, to convert Datsville. (21 years ago, 7-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
I'm working on some code to do this now : ) It's an extension of a utility I wrote a week ago that takes an Ldraw file and parses all the submodels and parts to give one a list of the pieces needed to build it. This new version just parses things (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) I know you're being tongue-in-cheek, but what it sounds like you are saying couldn't be further from the truth. I suspect it is due to your misinterpreting what I was trying to say. Given that it isn't exactly a trivial thing, that's not too (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) On second thought, this would be a bad idea, because objects outside the view cone could affect things, like reflections, shadows, and fog (important!!!). (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) True, but that would be an example of sloppy modeling on the part of the author ;) . (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) It's not exactly surprising that it worked ok, but if he didn't include any MPD support, then the results aren't necessarily correct. Since he presumably only pays attention to the locations of parts that he's willing to box, the references to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
