 | | L3PAO error
|
|
I just installed L3PAO and I keep getting an error when starting up that "POV-Ray could not be verified." I have reintalled POV-Ray 3 times now. What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance, Mark M (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
(...) All it really needs is some way to adjust things like the reflectivity of the tires-- they're kinda shiny, which shows off the splines, unlike the rendering with Brazil... The only giveaway on the Brazil model I could spot right off was the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
(...) Cool it really looks like a photo is very nice. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
(...) look at, indeed. Fredrik (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
(...) Lars, you have made my week with this posting! I wanted to thank you for pursuing this project, getting help from the big guns. These results are sooooo pretty and very encouraging. (...) Indeed. Other renderers may have an edge in creating (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | lgeo renders wrong part
|
|
how do you remedy library problems with lgeo? I just noticed that my part 3939 is being rendered as part 3942. Also my part 73435 is rendered 180 degrees off axis. please help me -tk (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | lgeo renders wrong part
|
|
how do you remedy library problems with lgeo? I just noticed that my part 3939 is being rendered as part 3942. Also my part 73435 is rendered 180 degrees off axis. please help me -tk (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
(...) Considering the usefulness of modeling mirrored parts this way (one file just references the other file) (it saves time and bytes), I'd say this is a problem that needs resolution in software. I *think* it could addressed with a POV-Ray macro, (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
(...) But the stud subfile was mirrored. At the lowest level, the ldraw system doesn't differentiate parts, models, primitives, etc. It just knows about files. So mirroring a stud primitive is logically identical to mirroring an entire part. BTW, (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
(...) Right! Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
(...) Something about MLCad that's worth noting is that fact that when you add a new part is uses the same rotation matrix as the part above it. Therefore, if you mirrored the part above the part you just added, the part you added is mirrored as (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: part swap
|
|
any suggestions? "travis" <phree@attbi.com> wrote in message news:H1uGDs.Byq@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
(...) Hmmm, I am trying to understand what you are stating here as applies to parts authoring. I get it if you mean that someone manually mirrored aspects of the DAT file without regard to how the stud would turn out at L3P quality level 3 -- so I (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
(...) I hope this was understood to be a joke. I love all you crazy CAD guys! (...) Indeed it does. A thousand thanks. I suppose this means there was indeed an error in the matrix locating the stud file (the subpart in directory P), right? This (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
(...) matrix that represents that stud is mirrored (meaning either 1 or 3 of the axes are flipped). You should get the same problem if you render both of the classic space wing pieces. One of them will have correct logos, the other won't, because (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3 [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi Richard, Do not blame Lars. Look at the contents of the 4869.dat file and try to replace this line 1 16 0 0 -52 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 stud.dat by this line 1 16 0 0 -52 1 0 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 stud.dat Does this solve your problem? Friendly, Damien (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
Hey Y'all: If you render the element 4869.dat with L3PAO quality level 3, as far as I can see you get the logo reversed. Other elements render fine. See: (URL) the aforementioned jet engine insert rendered next to a 2x2 round brick. The logo is (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
"travis" wrote... (...) No, I just made a POV file with the objects and the camera for the talented POV artists to play with. They have come up with fantastic settings for colors and lights. And yes, I hope to include some of these in the next L3P. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
i do see what you mean. it seems as if my colors are always a little dark using the lgeo librarys, but the detail makes up for it, and photoshop usually gets it to where i can live with it. -tk "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
no, its been renamed the autokickasstweak button. seriously I want a step by step tutorial on this image. I like how the shadows are so dull, the seems are invisible, subtle reflections, depth of field, could I go on and on... hell yeah. I'd pay for (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
