| | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
|
At 09:45 PM 7/14/99 , Todd Lehman wrote: [...] Mega Snippage... (...) I guess it does make sense to just have one. And it should allow discussion on the models submitted. (...) Just having a newsgroup for the OMR submission... Could you set up (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
|
(...) Product Programmes? Let's see, what would that list look like, then? .cad.dat.omr.dacta .cad.dat.omr.duplo .cad.dat.omr.mindstorms .cad.dat.omr.primo .cad.dat.omr.scala .cad.dat.omr.service .cad.dat.omr.system .cad.dat.omr.technic (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
|
(...) Enh...you're probably right. But we could at least have .system and .technic to separate those?? (...) Ok, so what do you think about the group thing? I think its a good idea and would be a nice place to cumulate models of such type. It is (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) Nah, why go through all that work? -- just embed the directory name into the zipfile. I'm a bit rusty on pkzip (I use tar these days) but essentially: pkzip xxxxz-yy.zip sets\xxxxz-yy\*.* which is analagous to tar -cvf xxxxz-yy.tar (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
|
(...) Why would there need to be more than 1 group? (...) yup! --Todd (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|