 | | Numbers Report - 10 November 2003
|
|
Section Totals 178 certified files. 306 files need admin review. 423 files need more votes. 521 have uncertified subfiles. 140 held files. Total Files: 1,568 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-11-10: 178 / 306 / 423 / 521 / 140 (1,568) 2003-11-03: (...) (21 years ago, 10-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: voting...
|
|
(...) That's my opinion, also. I posted my comment originally for several reasons: 1. As a "nudge" to other reviewers -- "Hey! We got a zillion files loaded here! How about we all vote on some of 'em, and get some of 'em processed and out the door?" (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org MOTM, SOTM Submissions
|
|
Due to the hard work of the team members, we hope to have the Model of the Month (MOTM) and Scene of the Month (SOTM) contests up and running by next month. As such I'd like to ask for any and all submissions to these two contests. If you are new to (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker sorting suggestion
|
|
Here is the solution (IMO) to the sorting thing for the PT and to the problem of files sitting there for ages. All files marked "hold" or "needs admin review" or "certified" (i.e. "you cant do anything with this file right now") go to the bottom of (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 27 October 2003
|
|
(...) I sort of think we shouldn't go there. Just my opinion. This isn't a competition. (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 3 November 2003
|
|
Section Totals 158 certified files. 289 files need admin review. 418 files need more votes. 540 have uncertified subfiles. 147 held files. Total Files: 1,552 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-11-03: 158 / 289 / 418 / 540 / 147 (1,552) 2003-10-27: (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) My guess: If someone votes "will review" it's like it's on their to-do list because they think they're a good candidate. Submitting a modified part should not clear WILL NOT and WILL review votes. Only a hold/certify should clear them Give a (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) I like this idea. It solve the perceived de-emphasis on [art with uncertified subparts. (...) I think the parts list should list everything currently on the PT. This way I can find a subfile I may have missed or wasn't included in a model I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 27 October 2003
|
|
(...) You know, if we all want to keep score, I could just whip up a "reviews posted per user" page. I *not* saying this a good idea, just throwing it out for consideration. Steve (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: PT File Queue has (minor) bug
|
|
(...) I wouldn't exactly characterize that as a "bug". Maybe if the page was called "My File Queue"... But it might be a nice feature for it to ignore files you've already looked at. Steve (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Bugs with the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) First off, a bigger issue with this file is that it is a model, not a part. I feel it goes beyond the idea of a shortcut, or complete assembly. However, to your point. This file uses *3* unofficial files. Yes, they are updates of (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) OK, so let's figure out a better sort order. The possible 'statuses' for files are: - Certified! - Needs Admin review - Needs more votes - Subfiles aren't certified - Hold My thinking when I constructed the list and the sorting was: - Keep the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) Make deals with people. Trade reviews - you'll look at their files (and offer honest reviews) if they'll look at yours. (...) I'm sorry you've gotten that feeling. My feeling is that the current system gives a lot *more* power to the standard (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
Going back a ways for this one... (...) I considered going a similar route when I constructed the PT: offer reviewers a list of checkpoints that they should consider when posting a review. I abandoned this thinking because the 'rules' for processing (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 27 October 2003
|
|
((URL) Posted by 'fwcain' 791 matches found. (21 years ago, 27-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 27 October 2003
|
|
Section Totals 109 certified files. 332 files need admin review. 413 files need more votes. 537 have uncertified subfiles. 148 held files. Total Files: 1,539 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-10-27: 109 / 332 / 413 / 537 / 148 (1,539) 2003-10-20: (...) (21 years ago, 27-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 20 October 2003
|
|
Section Totals 107 certified files. 330 files need admin review. 368 files need more votes. 553 have uncertified subfiles. 146 held files. Total Files: 1,504 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-10-20 - 107 / 330 / 368 / 553 / 146 (1,504) 2003-10-14 - (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 14 October 2003
|
|
Section Totals 96 certified files. 341 files need admin review. 359 files need more votes. 545 have uncertified subfiles. 148 held files. Total Files: 1,489 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-10-14 - 096 / 341 / 359 / 545 / 148 (1,489) 2003-10-08 - (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Updates page still WAY out of date
|
|
(...) I don't know that my post had anything to do with it, but in any event thanks to whoever updated the page for updating it. And my "way out of date" title was badly chosen, but I do think 7 months is a long time on the web. --Travis (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Updates page still WAY out of date
|
|
(...) I wouldn't say "way out of date" is a appropriate label, it's more like "some things have fallen through the cracks". As far as the missing items you have brought up, the issue is known and someone is assigned to fix it. Addionally, the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
