 | | on the word "official" in "OMR"
|
|
Pardon me if this has come up somewhere already...I just wanna register a suggestion... On any resource that contains the phrase "Official Model Repository" in the context of LEGO sets, I think it would be a good idea to define what "official" (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) Ooops, I thought I covered that when I wrote this yesterday about the sets-DB: "Those URLs aren't guaranteed to be the final URLs in the system for sets, but when they move to a better URL nomenclature for sets, there'll be automatic (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) Ok, I see. And I can see advantages and disadvantages to that too: Advantages: - Set can be publicly accessible for comments and editing before placed on a site and approved. - Set can be sent to one place and multiple model editors can have (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) To add some clarification to the original newsgroup idea, I didn't mean that things like the Lugnet sets-DB would automatically root through the newsgroups and point to any old version of a model that happened to appear in the .models.sets (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
I need some pointers and input on how the OMR should display the download pages and also where the files will be stored. I remember when discussions on the OMR first started the general consensus was to use a Lugnet newsgroup to store the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) Tim, Steve is speaking from a very wise standpoint (on many levels). You can never go wrong by offering to host things that people voluntarily contribute. But if people start to get the feeling that there is pressure to contribute or to let go (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) won't (...) in a (...) could be (...) I guess it could work if it is a widely-distributed mockup. If the part number is in the file correctly and in the correct position, no changes would have to be made to that line to get it to work properly (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) That's what I'd say too :) -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) suggestion. Notice (...) including commentary (...) makes it much (...) comment, it won't (...) correctly place it in a (...) to have to put (...) there could be (...) same as the (...) I think that if it is something like 0 insert piece 2916 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
I think you guys are missing the point of Tom's excellent suggestion. Notice the "0" in front of the 2916 line. That means he's just including commentary on where the part will go if and when it becomes official. It makes it much easier to add it in (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) set, and if (...) the plain (...) file or in the (...) Submit it the set, (...) hatless? Also, what (...) standard smiley? (...) I'd say forget the hat, and smiling might help brighten up someone's day :) Ryan (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) So, what's the ruling on this? Omit the fig or submit it hatless? Also, what if a face design hasn't been created? Use a blank head or a standard smiley? Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) Correct. Allowing mockups would cause confusion and inconsistency throughout the repository. Comment out the parts that do not exist and leave the part blank. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) without the ghost (...) and the " 0 " NO. NO MOCK-UPS ARE ALLOWED. It doesn't matter wether or not they are commented or not. We decided to use only pieces that are 'official', parts that everyone has. Ryan (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) ok say you know the part #, and oh say you made a mockup, so (before) (ill use 2916 train front) 1 12 -4 50 10 0 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 -1 2916.file after 0 PART NOT OFFICIAL / MISSING 0 1 12 -4 50 10 0 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 -1 2916.file thats my idea? (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
what about for example the ghost??? do we put in a minifig without the ghost shawl??? what about the skelleton? do we put in just the skull? (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) What if an element is missing? Say, a hat for example. Submit it the set, including minifig, sans hat? Jeff (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Software Download Templates
|
|
Tim, Sorry I haven't tackled the template pages for any of my utilities. I've got just a couple of comments: 1. The author of a utility should not rate the utility. If you want reviews, get other people to do them. Which isn't a bad idea--get a few (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: some questions about the OMR
|
|
(...) Umm, the 'm' key changes between normal(default), coarse, and fine. Why don't you go play around with it. It really helps when putting 1x1 tiles on the front of vehicles for headlights. Ryan (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: some questions about the OMR
|
|
(...) fine movement?????? what the???? (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
