 | | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) No, the entire minifig cannot be omitted. It is part of the set, and if the decorated element does not exist, the author is to use the plain version of that file and attach a comment in the errors.dat file or in the model itself. -Tim Courtney (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: some questions about the OMR
|
|
(...) (URL)2.do you have to have 0 step commands in the file? No. (...) file (...) Yes, you do. (...) Absolutely not. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | some questions about the OMR
|
|
1.what was aggreed to as the final header format/filename convention? 2.do you have to have 0 step commands in the file? 3.do you have to put sub-models (e.g. the bogies on a train) in a seperate file if you do not want to/have not done so? 4.what (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
i think that if the torso for a minifig or an other important part is not available then the whole minifig and all accessories can be omitted. (25 years ago, 20-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
Tim Courtney: (...) My MPD splitter never overwrites existing files - unless you set some flag I can't remember, so it should be safe. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and 8.3
|
|
Steve: (...) No, but "sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk" is not my e-mail address - even though some of my software clams that. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) I agree on all points! I'm glad you finally understood me ;) --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) positioned. They (...) a sub-model (...) place because (...) to detract (...) without using (...) you're trying (...) purpose of (...) help in this (...) submodel (to (...) nothing to (...) appears like (...) Yes, you are making more sense (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) You're making a lot more sense now. I understand better what you're trying to say and I agree with where you're coming from. Part of the purpose of the OMR is to provide 3d virtual instructions, so this would help in this case. They should not (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) That makes sense. I think we should continue to follow this reasoning. (...) Sub-models are not only used so that they can be easily positioned. They are used to make following the instructions easier. Inlining a sub-model defeats the purpose (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
