Subject:
|
Re: some questions about the OMR
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:30:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
613 times
|
| |
|
|
At 12:51 PM 6/20/99 +0000, jonathan wilson wrote:
> 1.what was aggreed to as the final header format/filename convention?
http://lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.announce:251
> 2.do you have to have 0 step commands in the file?
No.
> 3.do you have to put sub-models (e.g. the bogies on a train) in a seperate • file
> if you do not want to/have not done so?
Yes, you do.
> 4.what is the rules regarding the use of unofficial parts? can you use them?
Absolutely not.
-Tim Courtney
ldraw.org Project Coordinator
http://www.ldraw.org
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: some questions about the OMR
|
| Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:199906211334.GA...omm.com... (...) Tim, I think the ideal is to have submodels separate, preferably in a .mpd file. But I think we should accept sets without submodels with the caveat that if (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | some questions about the OMR
|
| 1.what was aggreed to as the final header format/filename convention? 2.do you have to have 0 step commands in the file? 3.do you have to put sub-models (e.g. the bogies on a train) in a seperate file if you do not want to/have not done so? 4.what (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
