Subject:
|
Re: some questions about the OMR
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:19:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
670 times
|
| |
|
|
On 6/23/99, at 10:58 AM, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > some would be a pain in the ass to re-do such as the • metroliner but
> > some may be able to be done...
>
> Ok, do what you can and submit those. I get the idea you have • a lot of
> sets done in LDraw. I'm glad you're willing to allow your • models to be
> used in the Repository.
But, there are going to be some that you have to fix, jonathan.
There
were several models if I remember correctly that you used the
"floating
element" technique(how is that word supposed to be spelled?),
which
means that they were not placed the way Lego had in their
instructions.
Also in some other models you didn't use the 'fine' movement.
You
might want to start using that. An example is all of your castle
wagon
wheels.
Just some things to think about.
Ryan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: some questions about the OMR
|
| (...) that are (...) Explain what you mean by half and half. Also, sets that don't have submodels in the instructions don't requre submodels in the OMR files. (...) Ok, do what you can and submit those. I get the idea you have a lot of sets done in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
