 | | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
(...) Another good point. I will add a provision about signing your work for sure. Many people do that and there is no problem with doing so. Thanks Anders for bringing that up, -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GFItLI.9zy@lugnet.com... (...) I think labels should be allowed - it can make it harder for someone else to use the picture in other circumstances, and you might want to sign your work. -- (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
(...) It's not just that. It was more of a fairness issue. Some people have sites with pictures up. Some don't. Some may not even have multiple images of what they entered to put on a site. So I thought it fairer if the voting was based just on the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
Terry, Regarding the new rules, I like them, except for the part about not specifying a web address and not providing multiple views. All of my renderings would fit into the "model" category except for this. I like to provide a web link to multiple (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
Hi Shiri, If there is any thought of voting for mine, then vote for one of the others. I've already won twice. I just wanted to enter this to show off some more models. I don't really care about winning. There are plenty of really strong entries (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
(...) Such big decisions! Silly castle people, can't you take turns? The vote'll be split among you all! Who do I vote for? I'm torn, Brad's cathedral is cool but Tamy and Elin and the dragon... ugh!! -Shiri (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
Hey all, Time to vote. (URL) luck to the entrants. And notice that there is a link to an additional rules page. I've decided to try a split format. A model-only contest and a scene contest. The rules are spelled out on how and what to enter. (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM Parameters question
|
|
(...) Short answer: Yes A parts "unofficial" status should not be a hindrance to its use. Similar to the use of a "mock-up" part to fill in where no official piece yet exists. If it does the job in place of a part that is not yet available, use it. (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
Steve: (...) You create a file named "<filename>.meta" for each file named "<filename>", and put the line Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 in it (and ask me to activate the CERN meta module for the directory the files are located in). (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
(...) OK, fine. So how do I mark the files as HTML, besides giving them an .html extension (which I've now done)? Steve (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
(...) FYI: more files have been relisted, including a primitive file. Which immediately revealed a minor-ish bug in the code. Anyway, things are rolling along... Steve (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
"Jacob Sparre Andersen" <sparre@nbi.dk> wrote in message news:Pine.OSF.4.21.0....nbi.dk... (...) Ah, I see it's working now. I didn't check it after Chris had mentioned that it was now working. Dan (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
Daniel: (...) Since the "Content-Type" field in the HTTP header is set correctly, it is only defect browsers, which use extensions to determine file types, that will get in trouble. (...) That was because the files on the server were marked as not (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
"Jacob Sparre Andersen" <sparre@nbi.dk> wrote in message news:Pine.OSF.4.21.0....nbi.dk... (...) But this breaks handling of HTML for browsers that only rely on the extension or the content-type header (Netscape being the biggest one!). Maybe adding (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
Steve: (...) Yes. Or to be exact: If you ask for (URL).html it will redirect you to (URL) (which in general will identify the same document) (...) Yes (as far as I remember your message). Jacob (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
(...) OK, we've got that (now). (...) Are you saying that the server is removing the ".html" from the response? So what I'm seeing in IE is expected behavior? Steve (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
(...) That's much better - it works now. Thanks, Chris (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
(...) That sounds cool and reasonable, except that (AFAIK) the files *do* have .html extensions, there are no redirects involved. See, I'll just login to the server, and cd to the unofficial/parts dir, and do an ls -l, and you'll see that all the (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New ldraw.org Feature Article - BFC Extensions
|
|
"Daniel Staudt" <dstaudt@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns90C6586501B2....63.236... (...) That was moved a _long_ time ago (I suppose we could put a sym-link up there). The new location for Feature Articles is www.ldraw.org/news/ - which (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Parts Update
|
|
Steve: (...) www.ldraw.org is configured, so only files whoose names end with ".html" (basically) will be treated as HTML documents. At the same time the server is configured to insist that requests for documents should not contain ".html". This is (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
