To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.macOpen lugnet.cad.dev.mac in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Macintosh / 886
885  |  887
Subject: 
Re: Copy of MacMegaPov 0.7
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.mac
Date: 
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:29:17 GMT
Viewed: 
7872 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.mac, Travis Cobbs wrote:
   In lugnet.cad.dev.mac, Allen Smith wrote:
   The version I posted does not require Classic. It’s an old CFM Carbon program (not Mach-O) that can run natively under both OS 8/9 and OS X. It is PowerPC though, so on an Intel Mac, it gets emulated via Rosetta. (But I suspect it runs faster there than it does on my Powerbook G4!)

Sorry. I used the command line unzip (on my Macbook) to unzip the file, and that toasted the contents. Apparently the resource fork didn’t extract properly. Using a different unzipper solved the problem.

For comparison, I rendered m6459.png (picture posted in earlier post) at 640x480, and the times were as follows (all on an original MacBook 2GHz).

Intel (command line-only) compile:

Time For Trace:    0 hours  0 minutes   2.0 seconds (2 seconds)
Time For Post:     0 hours  0 minutes   1.0 seconds (1 seconds)
    Total Time:    0 hours  0 minutes   3.0 seconds (3 seconds)

Your PPC (Carbon with UI) compile:

Time For Trace:    0 hours  0 minutes   8.0 seconds (8 seconds)
Time For Post:     0 hours  0 minutes   5.0 seconds (5 seconds)
    Total Time:    0 hours  0 minutes  13.0 seconds (13 seconds)

My PPC (command line-only) compile (different compiler, and no UI):

Time For Trace:    0 hours  0 minutes   8.0 seconds (8 seconds)
Time For Post:     0 hours  0 minutes   2.0 seconds (2 seconds)
    Total Time:    0 hours  0 minutes  10.0 seconds (10 seconds)

Not sure why all the times are rounded (truncated?) to the nearest second, but there is a noticeable difference between all three versions. Your compile has the huge advantage of an actual UI, though. It’s very odd that only the post-processing step took longer on yours, and not the trace. My guess is that there is something in there that the current GCC optimizes better than whatever compiler compiled yours (at least when running under Rosetta).

--Travis



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Copy of MacMegaPov 0.7
 
(...) Sorry. I used the command line unzip (on my Macbook) to unzip the file, and that toasted the contents. Apparently the resource fork didn't extract properly. Using a different unzipper solved the problem. --Travis (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR