Subject:
|
Re: Mac LDraw Viewer comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.mac
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Dec 2002 08:07:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1418 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <H7Jupx.3r3@lugnet.com>,
"Andrew Allan" <aallan@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> Christopher,
>
> > I put up screen shots of my caboose rendered by LDraw Viewer (Carbon)
> > and (Classic) and LDGLite.
> >
> > http://users.rcn.com/cjmasi/caboose_comparisson.htm
>
> Amazing! - Did you have "Back Face Culling" turned on on the Carbonversion?
No, I didn't have back face culling turned on. Turning on BFC causes the
window frames to disappear. Is this because LDViewer is making
assumptions about the way the part files that may not be true?
I just updated to 10.2.3, and that has changed some things a bit. I'll
update the comparison page soon. I'll include BrickDraw3D.
> I have included 47 for clear and the other number for transparent red, however
> according to www.ldraw.org, clear colour numbers are obtained by adding 32 to
> the solid colour number. So for red which is 4, transparent red should be 36
> which is what I use normally in Ldraw Viewer.
I'll swith to 36.
> As of 5 minutes ago, I posted version 0.4, this fixes many of your comments
> so far.
>
> Andrew...
Thanks,
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mac LDraw Viewer comments
|
| Christopher, (...) Amazing! - Did you have "Back Face Culling" turned on on the Carbonversion? (...) I have included 47 for clear and the other number for transparent red, however according to www.ldraw.org, clear colour numbers are obtained by (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
