Results 5981 6000 of 7032.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.695) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.695) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.695) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.695) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.695) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.695) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.695) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
| | Re: New LDraw Parts
|
| Rene Virsik schrieb: (...) Please have a look at this thread: (URL) also hope that there will be more people that are working on the parts on the parts tracker. cu Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (18 years ago, 28-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) All of the parts authors would have to agree to that, because (and my knowledge is limited so if I mistake any assumptions let me know) the copyright of the part file seems to be held by the parts author not the LDraw Parts Library or any (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) This is crazy talk. People sign paintings, but nobody is ever gonna staple a note on the back of a painting that says, "This painting was created with ACME brand paints and brushes." Please don't insert any such crazy demand in the ldraw (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM Part Of The Month
|
| (...) niels, what do you think content managers are for? voting will be of course a piece of cake! just like MOTM/SOTM. luckily I've already started to set up a ballot and luckily I've got already some entries - have a look: (URL) cannot vote yet (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM Part Of The Month
|
| In lugnet.announce, Willy Tschager wrote: Neat idea! (...) Note that this doesn't stop someone submitting an update of a part that already exists (in the official library). I actually think that's good - major reworks of existing parts *should* be (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.694) |
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) As one of the CA's authors, my view on this is that you should state somewhere in your distribution of the image (i.e. on the web page hosting it, as a text file in a .zip, on the image itself, etc...) that the content were derived from the (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.694) | More: Next Page >>
|