|
 | | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| (...) Hey- but I never heard back about which ones you wanted me to work on. Should I do all the rings? That would solve this: (URL) the PT says to send new versions of existing official files to you instead of posting them directly. Should I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Motorcycle rider shortcut
|
| In this part: (URL) Easter refers at one point to BFCing the file. But there's no BFC stuff in there. It appears that the only change here is the title. Is it possible that Paul added it but then the name fix submission lacked that update? -- Tony (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Hidden male connectors (studs)
|
| Hello LCD "community", As female connectors (mainly stud inlets) can effectively hide male connectors (mainly studs), we should ensure that the LCD project do not waste such an opportunity to further speed up LDraw display. I think this possibility (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| Hello, Comments below... Travis Cobbs wrote: > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: > >>In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tony Hafner writes: >> >>>In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: >>> >>>>>Um... Not to stir the pot or (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Re: winding check tool
|
| (...) To check a file for BFC'ness, see (URL), question "How do I check a file for BFC Compliance?". To make a file BFC compliant, I recommend using LDAO's Editor. It includes a tool to change the winding for the currently selected line(s). My (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
| (...) Wow, good questions. We know that some collision detection is already practical - Eric Olsen demonstrated that over a year ago. But decomposing LDraw parts into convex objects, that would be a trick. Each external box 5 (or pair of box 5's) (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | does PT FAQ cover "CMDLINE"?...
|
| I've had several people ask me about the CMDLINE meta-statement. Shouldn't this meta-statement be covered in the FAQ for the Parts Tracker? (...) The CMDLINE meta-statement is a way of permitting the author to *document* certain run-time commands (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | numbers report
|
| I wish the stock market had this rate of growth... :-/ Section Totals 141 certified files. 57 files need admin review. 224 files need more votes. 243 have uncertified subfiles. 94 held files. (Total: 759 files.) (For comparison): (URL) (23 years ago, 14-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Re: Parts Tracker suggestion
|
| (...) Try (URL). :) I'd been thinking about this for awhile, but it was usually tied in with a whole "My Parts Tracker" kind of page. Which I never put together. Getting the review information was relatively easy. Steve (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| (...) [snip] OK, sounds reasonable to me. (...) Yes. (...) [snip more] You understand the usage correctly. Except there's no special tie between a 'mirroring' subfile reference and the INVERTNEXT command. Authors won't explicitly use one to 'undo' (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
| Steve Bliss wrote: > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Kyle McDonald wrote: > [snip more] > > You understand the usage correctly. Except there's no special tie > between a 'mirroring' subfile reference and the INVERTNEXT command. > Authors won't (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Re: Parts as volumes (instead of surfaces)
|
| (...) Maybe I'm missing a technical distinction, but it seems he used bounding boxes *for* collision detection, as opposed to using exact volumes. (...) True. My point was, marking up the LDraw part files for volume decomposition would either: a) Be (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Okay, this thread is way too old and I feel that I owe an explanation for my tardiness. I apologize to everyone who was looking forward to a usable prototype; I hope I didn't set expectations too high. Lately, I've been heavily involved in (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Numbers Report
|
| As of today, 23 April... Section Totals 213 certified files. 52 files need admin review. 236 files need more votes. 180 have uncertified subfiles. 98 held files. (Total: 779) (For comparison): (URL) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | matching pattern numbers???
|
| For patterned parts that occur together in a set -- say, for example, the various patterned parts from a Han Solo minifig (from the Star Wars theme) -- that have been or are being encoded as LCAD data files, shouldn't we be co-ordinating these (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Re: Idea, using functions for some primitives.
|
| Time to throw fuel on the fire. Why are we still latching ourselves on to the original dos LDRAW program. Isn't it time the LDraw community graduated to Windows/Mac based programs and let the DOS program fade away from usage. Much like other (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
