Results 3261 3280 of about 7000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| (...) Just a thought. If the POVRAY (or whatever) sections get too big, would it make sense to add 0 INCLUDE meta-command so the LDRAW only programs don't waste time parsing? Then the POV specific versions could be distributed separately from the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.891) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.891) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.891) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.891) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.891) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| Dear All, Currently, there are a number of files on the Parts Tracker which include embedded POV-Ray, using the 0 L3P meta-statement. I've been emailing with Lars, Paul and Chris about some concerns I have with this approach. Basically, before we (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
| | New style of part file
|
| I've posted three new files on the Parts Tracker, they are at: (3 URLs) These files are all 'shortcuts' - they don't have any code, except a reference to another part file. The reason I submitted these files is because these three parts are all (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| (...) Well yes, but I wasn't just thinking about POV. I thought that was your point in changing the syntax. The 0 INCLUDE meta-command could be used to install custom colors much like the ldliterc.dat file. I'm sure there are plenty of other non-POV (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
| Hello Carsten, In deed a great program! Hassle-free installation, opens as fast as NotePad, drag-n-drop files into workspace. I miss an L3Lab button, but since I don't use LDView, I renamed a copy of L3Lab.exe to LDView.exe and thus fooled (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| (...) [snip] (...) [snap] (...) Nod, right. INCLUDE has been mentioned before, in other contexts, and I'm generally in favor of it. But I'd rather discuss that in a separate thread - IF[N]DEF/ELSE/ENDIF wouldn't depend on INCLUDE. (although, for (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
| | A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| There is currently a discussion brewing on developing some LDraw frameworks that would make it easy for programmers (even me!) to write LDraw applications in Java, c++, python, and perl. Check it out here: (URL) here is a template of the object (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.890) |
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Well, this raises the point: what ideal is the LDraw format aiming for? I don't think it's really going anywhere; any real change to the format would break compatability with the legacy LDRAW.EXE. I'm proposing a class library for the existing (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.890) | More: Next Page >>
|