|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
 | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) All of the parts authors would have to agree to that, because (and my knowledge is limited so if I mistake any assumptions let me know) the copyright of the part file seems to be held by the parts author not the LDraw Parts Library or any (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) This is crazy talk. People sign paintings, but nobody is ever gonna staple a note on the back of a painting that says, "This painting was created with ACME brand paints and brushes." Please don't insert any such crazy demand in the ldraw (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote: ... (...) ... I think having a direct link to the part would be a great idea. <shameless self-promotion> You could even include a .dat file that contains exactly one line: a reference to the part. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) As one of the CA's authors, my view on this is that you should state somewhere in your distribution of the image (i.e. on the web page hosting it, as a text file in a .zip, on the image itself, etc...) that the content were derived from the (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) There is one significant difference between LDraw and Photoshop in that you pay for the right to use Photoshop without giving credit. That said I don't think we need to vandalise our images to put the credit in but I'm not completely averse to (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| (...) I agree, clarification on rendered images is needed. If a rendering using LDraw parts is a derivative work, and derivative works are required to visibly display credit, that's a problem. It won't show up on my renders; I don't burn "Credit: (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
| Hi Zach, (...) Actually it is misspelt throughout the Licence but I can't be bothered to go through it. Insofar as LDraw has an official language it is Australian English. (...) Good point. Perhaps an additional comment like: In order to avoid the (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| | Web browser compatibility testing request
|
| I'm adding a new feature to LDView that will generate a parts list web page for any model being viewed in LDView. The HTML code that I'm generating makes heavy use of CSS, and I don't have some browsers that users might use. While my output (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| | Re: Web browser compatibility testing request
|
| For anyone who's interested, here is the output from a more complicated model: (URL) chose pyramid for the test because it allowed me to take a screenshot of the entire page.) Notice that it doesn't show images for any parts that aren't recognized (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.457)
|
