Subject:
|
Re: 2 L3P Related Programs and a Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:27:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1234 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jeroen de Haan wrote:
>
> "Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.pobursky.com> wrote in message
> news:HK1MFM.60F@lugnet.com...
> > The second program I just started on and I haven't named it yet. Basically it
> > runs a file through L3P and then post processes the output substituting the
> > part/color definitions with those of custom library(s) in a priority set by the
> > user. This is useful if you have several different difinition librarys that are
> > in various state of completeness. For example, you could wrote you own part
> > definitions for some parts/primitives and then tell the program to substitute
> > your part defs, then use those in some other library, then leave the defualt L3P
> > parts for those that aren't in the the first two. If there is any overlap then
> > the high priority library take precedence.
> >
> > -Orion
>
> Hi Orion,
>
> Why should you want this program? As long as you include colours before the
> are defined, everything is okee, since L3P generates code that says: ifndef
> (ColorX) which means that if a color is already defined it won't be
> re-defined.
Yes you are right, but I hate manually adding the colors I want so I'm creating
a program to do it for me
> For parts/primitives this won't work that way but I think Lars will add this
> (ifndef (PARTNAME) for parts too in the new version. Better ask him.
I know he's adding this becuase I was the one who asked him to. See above on
why I want to program this.
Basically we've been needing an L3P post processor for a while now. The idea
above was just the seed that started me thinking. I have about a dozen other
ideas ranging from custom stud logos to diffing and combining the L3P output to
preserve custom code.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2 L3P Related Programs and a Question
|
| "Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> wrote in message news:HK1MFM.60F@lugnet.com... (...) Basically it (...) the (...) by the (...) that are (...) part (...) substitute (...) defualt L3P (...) then (...) Hi Orion, Why should you want (...) (21 years ago, 24-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
