 | | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Selçuk <teyyareci> <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Datum: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 16:12 Onderwerp: Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902) (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
I am trying to get a complete list of the type 0 metacommands and this is what I currently have, if people can let me know the ones that I am missing that would be fantastic. Standard LDraw metacommands (see (URL) STEP - Marks the end of the (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with JJ Memorial
|
|
(...) I've maintained a local copy of the original archives on my mirror for the l-cad parts updates for a long time now. (URL) yesterday morning with the new 9902 update and the new complete.exe (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) When my kinfolk (1) try this trick on me, they very quickly find themselves in a different room (or if I can help it, a different building) from where I am. They have learned that this tactic of begging brings exactly the opposite of what they (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
(...) I agree, and I also want to extend a Thank You to Todd, Terry, Steve, Leo and others too numerous to mention for their generous contributions to the LEGO community. It is frusterating sometimes to have to wait for the latest update in any (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
Wow...How nice. I really like this idea. I have been always behind the idea of separating those two universe, but couldn't realise that they could be both "separate" and "together" at the same time. Nice and elegant solution in my side. What's you (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
Terrel, I'm sorry that I forgotten to mention in my last message, but if has any use for anyone (from misunderstanding point of view) I never intended to blame anyone, especially you. I believe you have the one having one of the greatest portions (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor
|
|
(...) IMHO this numbering method makes no sense at all !! First, the 3 parts are not separable and makes no sense using them separated. LEGO decided to number them like if it was a _single_ part and have put the 32025 number in the _main_ part which (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>; lugnet.cad@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 3:23 Subject: LDraw part update 9902 Terry, I've (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
(...) What about adding a "reference" catalog to the LDraw tree? It should be used for LDraw files with _exact_ part-number relations. The name could be "LDraw\LEGO", "LDraw\Official", or "LDraw\Reference" (the last is too long). Parts like the six (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
(...) Right now there is nothing "wrong" with the part, per se. The part number (71427) refers to a specific color for that composite item. The part is not actually any color - it is in #16. Right now, you could use that part as-is. The number is a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
I am truly sorry that we are going through this problem. But LDraw is a dual purpose program. The original purpose, and one that is still valid, useful, and needed, is that of a parts reference. A parts reference that depends on using TLG part (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
So, nothing could be more clear than this example. As I said before, Continuing to follow TLG naming scheme causes problems. Always. Is it a nice thing to put some already done and meet the quality requirements parts on hold, just because they are (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad.dev (1999.03.24.1000) #794-799 (6 articles)
|
|
(...) ^^^...^^^ Tim: PLEASE don't reply directly to digest messages -- when you do so, you destroy the subject line as well as References headers crucial for proper article threading. As stated near the top of each digest message: To reply to a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
o.k. but what is wrong with the 9v motor? it is the correct color and the correct number? is there something wrong with the piece? (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with JJ Memorial
|
|
(...) We have long thought that could happen. But it may be just a temporary problem, as that has happened before. My advice, wait a bit and see if the problem clears up. If you have a pressing need for the original archives, ask me and I can email (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
(...) Yes, that is basically why. We are trying to work out a compromise between the use of LDraw as a modelling tool and as a parts reference. Some number codes refer to specific-colored composite pieces. So using those numbers for generic #16 (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
steve: please can i have the new roadplates you made and the 1 x 2 x 2 brick? also do you have any plans to make the 9 stud curve with pattern? it would be very useful and it would complete the set. also can i have the helipad pattern as well? i (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | problem with JJ Memorial
|
|
i just discovered that the links to james site (ldraw.exe etc) from the JJM are now broken. it appears that james site has been deleted (the ftp part that is, the http part is still there). someone may want to fix this. (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | vote 9902
|
|
just got the vote! great. BUT i am curious as to why the folowing were put on hold... the large technic hook? the knife? the harpoon? the 9v motor? i assume that the hook,harpoon and kjnife suffer the same problem that toe antenna 6h suffered in the (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
