Subject:
|
Re: vote 9902
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 03:49:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
699 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:25:24 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
wrote:
> just got the vote! great. BUT i am curious as to why the folowing were put on
> hold...
> the large technic hook?
> the knife?
> the harpoon?
> the 9v motor?
> i assume that the hook,harpoon and kjnife suffer the same problem that toe
> antenna 6h suffered in the last update...
Yes, that is basically why. We are trying to work out a compromise between the
use of LDraw as a modelling tool and as a parts reference.
Some number codes refer to specific-colored composite pieces. So using those
numbers for generic #16 pieces would be inaccurate - thus ruining the accuracy
of LDraw as a parts reference.
So releasing those parts as-is would cause problems.
In addition, the knife is on hold per the authors request.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: vote 9902
|
| o.k. but what is wrong with the 9v motor? it is the correct color and the correct number? is there something wrong with the piece? (25 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: vote 9902
|
| So, nothing could be more clear than this example. As I said before, Continuing to follow TLG naming scheme causes problems. Always. Is it a nice thing to put some already done and meet the quality requirements parts on hold, just because they are (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | vote 9902
|
| just got the vote! great. BUT i am curious as to why the folowing were put on hold... the large technic hook? the knife? the harpoon? the 9v motor? i assume that the hook,harpoon and kjnife suffer the same problem that toe antenna 6h suffered in the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
13 Messages in This Thread: ![vote 9902 -Jonathan Wilson (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Jonathan Wilson (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Terry Keller (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Selçuk Göre (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Terry Keller (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902) -Jacob Sparre Andersen (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902) -Selçuk Göre (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Selçuk Göre (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Terry Keller (27-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Selçuk Göre (27-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Jonathan Wilson (27-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: vote 9902 -Terry Keller (27-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|