Subject:
|
Re: lsynthcp community development project setup on sourceforge
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:25:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
889 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin Clague writes:
> > I don't think main() should do the fputs() on the uppercased line.
> > Remember the thread here about not making unnecessary changes to the
> > files.
>
> Yes. I was trying to make lsynth not case sensitive when it came to
> recognizing keywords, but I don't like the fact that it changes every line.
Yeah, I thought so. Other options are copying the line before the
strupper(), or using strnicmp() or strncasecmp() for the keyword test.
The copy method is easier to do in a portable way.
> > Perhaps there could be an option to only dump the SYNTH portions, and
> > dump them to separate files based on an optional FILENAME at the end of
> > the SYNTH BEGIN line.
>
> This sounds good. We need to be careful about how we describe optional
> parameters though. I know we want to add a length parameter, now filename,
> and I'm sure there will be others. I think that positional parameters may
> be a real hassle. How do you feel about named parameters
> (FILENAME="foo.dat", LENGTH=20, UNITS=CM)?
I like the named parameters. That makes it easy to add new ones and
be able to ignore them in older versions of lsynthcp.
Don
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
