 | | PT Author question
|
|
This is actually a double question: 1. For parts on the PT that are fixes of existing parts, it's it considered okay to upload a new version of the part, fixing any errors or hold vote comments that my exist? 2. What about for original parts if the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GyICs1.3o2@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) be (...) It's more complicated to program, but wouldn't it be an idea to show the next part that is similar to the one you've just looked at? Eg. you (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) I've been thinking more about this, I'm not sure what a good "next" would be. The current (URL) queue page> works on sort of the current data. Posting a review upsets that sort, so it's hard to say "give me the next file after the one I just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Define "next" in this context. With a good definition of "next" I think it would be great... (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | PT Suggestion
|
|
Dan mentioned an idea to me, but he's letting me post about it. Probably because I was the one who wanted to see what other people think. On the review results page (you know, the little page that says you posted a review successfully), would be (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Good idea. I was working on something like this, a way to search the activity log, but I got distracted. Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Another PT Suggestion
|
|
I'd like to see a Parts I've Submitted page. This way I can keep track of what I've submitted and respond to comments quicker. -Orion (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: are you sure?
|
|
(...) That works for me. Steve (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: disabling BFC (was "Head w/ Headset Over Brown Hair")
|
|
(...) Hey, that's pretty neat! You should get in touch with this LDraw.org I've heard about; you could be like an advisor or something... Thanks for your help! Dave! (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: are you sure? [DAT]
|
|
(...) (subpart 1 is my frontside, subpart 2 is just the color gold) (...) you sure that this will work? (...) Personally, I would prefer just a single level of nesting, like this 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Classic Space Logo Pattern 0 Name: 3004p90.dat 0 (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: are you sure?
|
|
(...) This would work, but isn't it a little bit strange? I think you should make only the 2nd subpart for the gold surfaces. The pattern you can make in a Subpart in the main directory (like a real part). See 80.dat or other Subparts in the main (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: disabling BFC (was "Head w/ Headset Over Brown Hair") [DAT]
|
|
(...) Try: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 2-4cyli.dat Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question about subparts
|
|
(...) As others have said, you *must* put the gold areas into a separate subfile from the rest. But you can still have a subfile for the entire pattern, that you can use in multiple parts. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | are you sure? [DAT]
|
|
(...) sounds weird. just to make it clear that I got it right. both subparts (subpart 1 is my frontside, subpart 2 is just the color gold) go in the parts\s-folder and the 3004p90.dat part would look like this: 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Classic Space Logo (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers Minifig Reference
|
|
(...) Harumph. It appears that someone forgot to click "save" after he keyed in all those filenames. So I guess the splat isn't so redundant after all. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers Minifig Reference
|
|
(...) i used it to mark minifigs that already had one or more files submitted to the tracker. It's somewhat redundant -- existing files are listed; if the full file name isn't given, then it doesn't exist yet. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can L3P have option to *NOT* give warning for "emphasis lines"?
|
|
Lars, I just wanted a way of letting a novice know that a color-16 line _might_ not be an _accident_ on the part of the author. A novice reviewer probably hasn't read your FAQ, and is just using the "File Check" option from the "Tools" page at the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question about subparts
|
|
(...) What he said... ;-) The _ONLY_ legitimate way to handle dithered colors is with a type-1 (sub)file reference. Thus, you _must_ have one separate (sub)file for each dithered color to be used in a specific pattern. (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question about subparts
|
|
(...) Yes you have to, else you wouldn't need subparts for dittered colors. CU Bernd (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers Minifig Reference
|
|
(...) Steve, What's the splat ("*") for? Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
