Subject:
|
Re: Future extension of dat files?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:48:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
482 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> It is my experience that "development" type discussions are no longer
> run on LUGNET, rather they have been taken to some disclosed private
> mailing lists.
Oh, no. That's not what the 'private mailing list' is for at all. I'm
sorry you've gotten that impression. :(
Earlier this year, a private mailing list was set up, for one express
purpose: to put together a proposed organization & charter for LDraw.org.
One or two other things have gone through the list (hammering out the user &
redistribution license, for example). But it was never intended that the
list be the exclusive (in either or both senses) place to discuss LDraw
development issues.
Let me repeat: discussion of the future of LDraw belongs on Lugnet,
especially in lugnet.cad.dev and lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw!
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Future extension of dat files?
|
| (...) It is my experience that "development" type discussions are no longer run on LUGNET, rather they have been taken to some disclosed private mailing lists. Personally, I don't see any benefits from changing the extensions. We already have .LDR (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
