 | | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) 4589.DAT ?? (...) I've started some design work - but its in the early stages (...) This is done as 3068p81 and submitted for the next voting (see (URL)#2549-1-01 Pirate Bridge (...) A mock-up was done recently bt Tore Eriksson (see (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
One other thing. In future, you should know that asking for parts to be made is not a good idea and most of the people here frown uopn it, especially for such a large list (I should know, I have had it happen to me numerous times) -- Jonathan Wilson (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) That would be the cone 1` x 1 (...) Both awaiting voting (...) Also awaiting voting (...) If this is the hand axe, then no it is not done. The pickaxe has been done as has the small castle axe. The large castle axe also has not been done. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
I, an avid lego user in earlier years, was amazed to see the amount of progress and programs, particularly ldraw, that were created for lego use on computers. However, I couldn't help but notice that several of ldraw's parts are missing, and as the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDS ver 0.29
|
|
(...) Ahh! Fantastic! Now, that was a great example, wasn't it? Best thing with it was that the "Eternal loop" error check works... :) Should of course be: i=1 while i<=5 gosub :hello i=i+1 wend end (25 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDS ver 0.29
|
|
(...) Done. WHILE-WEND done, too. (URL) a sample script that shows usage of WHILE and GOSUB: i=1 while i<=5 gosub :hello wend end :hello print 0 "Hello"; gosub world return :WORLD print "World." return /Tore (25 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDS ver 0.28
|
|
(...) I thought that WHILE-WEND was easy to code, but I'm having great problems with it... :( And yes, GOSUB and RETURN have crossed my mind. Could be wrong again, but it sounds almost as easy as GOTO. (...) Oh dear! *sigh* If I get the time then I (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDS ver 0.28
|
|
(...) Double-:) (...) Right! Any chance of getting GOSUB and RETURN? (...) Hmm. It's your program, and you should definitely use it the way your want. But I've always preferred DO ... LOOP over WHILE ... WEND. It's partly because DO ... LOOP can be (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
Rui: (...) See <URL: (URL) >. You are welcome to try to make it easier to understand. (...) I am constantly (almost) thinking about adding a search feature to ldraw.org, but I haven't had time to find an implementation I like. Play well, Jacob (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDS ver 0.28
|
|
GOTO was very easy to program. :o) A little more seriously now: I think it belongs to the BASIC-like syntax I have chosen. Especially in IF statements. Anyway, noone is forced to [ab]use it. I don't think WHILE-WEND will be too hard to code, and it (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
