 | | Reference Site Inconsistencies —Steve Bliss
|
| | | I was cross-checking some information between LDraw/Partsref, Lutz Uhlmann's Parts Reference, and James Jessiman's Unofficial LEGO Parts Listing. I was specifically looking at the parts with number less than 1000[1], because I need to get a better (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | (...) [snip] (...) Yes, this was used as the nose cone for the rocket in 358 (Rocket Base) and is also in 230 (Salon Colette). So I guess I ought to model it !! Chris (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Whoa! Wow! (URL) learn somethin' new about LEGO every day! :) --Todd p.s. Question: Was it really 3 standard bricks tall (most likely) or perchance was it just shy or just over 3 tall? Anyone got one for real? (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Chris Ernest Hall
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I do, but it's back at my mom's house in the SF Bay Area, and I'm here in sunny Cambridge, MA. If memory serves, it is indeed three bricks tall. It's a cool piece, and I'm surprised TLC has never brought it back, since they seem to have a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Frank Buiting
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Yup I've just checked it (I have two of the cones from the 725 freight train) (URL) the cone is three bricks tall, the size 4x4x3 is correct. -Frank (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Chris Ernest Hall
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) That's the set I got mine from as well. The rocketbase set was perhaps my most desired set during my early childhood that I didn't end up getting. - chris (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies) —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yes it really is - and yes I have two in white. Chris (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | (...) Please Do!!! -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies —Gregor Benedikt Rochow
|
| | | | | (...) Parts (...) I noticed part 3943, 4x4x2 cone. Partsref (and other places that have it) show it with an axle hole through the top. While I've never seen the shown version myself, the 2 grey ones in 924 may have an axle shape recessed in the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | "Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote... (...) Yes, I began modelling the 358 Rocket Base in LEdit two years ago, and almost finished, when I realized the top of the rocket was not in LDraw yet. Should of course have checked before I (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
