Subject:
|
Re: Comprehensive meta-command list
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 13:10:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
452 times
|
| |
|
|
Lars C. Hassing wrote in message <939367581.966085@ns.cci.dk>...
> But I admit that the idea that FACE (C)CW only affects the triangles/
> quads of the current file, and that INVERT only affects subfiles
> is much easier to comprehend and thus is a better solution.
> /Lars
In addition to being easier to comprehend, it has the advantage that each
part and primitive file only has to concern itself with its own vertex
order, and is not dependent on any other file. This is the primary benefit.
This makes parts and primitives truly modular and interchangeable.
-Gary
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Comprehensive meta-command list
|
| Gary Williams wrote in message ... (...) "...not dependent on any other file..." Well, I hope you agree that files depend on the inside/outside-definition of subfiles? Otherwise a file wouldn't know whether or not to use the INVERT. /Lars (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Comprehensive meta-command list
|
| Gary Williams wrote in message ... (...) Well, my assumption was that CCW was the default and that the current facing was passed to the subfile. Under these circumstances I think that my two examples are equivalent! But I admit that the idea that (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
