 | | Re: Voting page 9905
|
|
(...) vote early and often. ;) (...) Note to Karim: the reason your name is on 1-4con10.dat is because I had thrown that file together on my system awhile ago, but then I got confused about which files you had posted, and I was trying to be sure you (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
On Wed, 26 May 1999 06:18:52 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote: [snip] (...) Hmm. Did you mean 'skoash' or 'skoosh'? Seriously, it sounds fine to me. Steve (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: what has happened to these parts?
|
|
(...) my brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern was very similar to 3004p06.dat brick 1 x 2 with black grille pattern. however the p06 used rect.dat which gave a 24 colored edge around the black stripes. also my ferry windows stripes were more (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | what has happened to these parts?
|
|
why have these parts not been released for voting yet? the technic flexable hoses brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern slope brick 18 4 x 2 slope brick 65 6 x 6 x 2 quad inverted with cutouts shock absorber 1 x 2 x 2 (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
|
(...) I migth have a go at this piece, it has number 30360 embossed in it. But I'm not starting right now. And although I'm aware that most of you are desparately in need for this part, I strongly believe that this part needs some of the new (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How do you know the numbers?
|
|
I'm a bit puzzled. How do you guys know that the Technic Axle #5 has number 32073 (off my memory) and that the Technic Connector with Axlehole has number 32039? As far as I can see, these numbers are not printed on the parts. Do you have a spy (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Voting page 9905
|
|
Padewans, Voting for update 9905 commences: (URL) that 4 unapproved primitives are include for the cone 3x3x2 piece. (The 3x3x2 cone! Finally! I've been doing that Jedi mind-control hand movement in Steve's direction for *months* - guess it finally (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed primitive for notched round surface
|
|
Sorry Taskforce, I've made a crucial typing error in my answer to a mail from Lars yesterday. In the second part of the answer to his question: (...) "I believe that in this case a 1-4cyli primitive rotated over 45 degrees covers the inner wall (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) The "best" orientation for many parts is debatable, and usually easy enough to change when modelling. Especially on baseplates. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Yes, the consensus. That is the tough part. I do think that, whichever way we decide to go, that the cross-section should have a little more roundness to it. The output in POV-Ray is proof of that. OK people, how about this: Manfreds (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4ring3 [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4ring3.dat 0 Name: 1-4ring3.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official Primitive 4 16 3 0 0 2.772 0 1.148 3.696 0 1.531 4 0 0 4 16 2.772 0 1.148 2.121 0 2.121 2.828 0 2.828 3.696 0 1.531 4 16 2.121 0 2.121 1.148 0 2.772 1.531 0 3.696 2.828 0 2.828 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4rin10 [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4rin10.dat 0 Name: 1-4rin10.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official 4 16 10 0 0 9.239 0 3.827 10.163 0 4.21 11 0 0 4 16 9.239 0 3.827 7.071 0 7.071 7.778 0 7.778 10.163 0 4.21 4 16 7.071 0 7.071 3.827 0 9.239 4.21 0 10.163 7.778 0 7.778 4 16 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4cone1.dat [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4cone1.dat 0 Name: 1-4cone1.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official 5 16 0 1 1 0 0 2 -0.765 0 1.848 0.765 0 1.848 5 16 0.383 1 0.924 0.765 0 1.848 0 0 2 1.414 0 1.414 5 16 0.707 1 0.707 1.414 0 1.414 0.765 0 1.848 1.848 0 0.765 5 16 0.924 1 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to Primitives Committee:
|
|
(...) I'll work on these fixes and repost tonight. --Karim (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
Parts Authors: don't forget to update the Parts Tracker pages. Please mark your parts which are in the LCAD9904 update (and don't need more work). I have to post these reminders as penance for continually forgetting to do my updates. Steve LDraw (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where should I center this one?
|
|
(...) Whoops, you're right. But, in the case of the 1x2 plates and bricks, the centerpoint is on level with the top of a plane, and on the rectangular lattice formed by the studs. As for the 2x5 and 2x9 hinge plates, these are a real exception. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to Primitives Committee:
|
|
(...) Quick update: I'm in favor of these files (I need one of them for the 3x3x2 cone!) Last night, I asked the other members of the committee for feedback. Some corrections are needed on these files: 1. They should each have a standard header. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) it would be no problem to model the coils/wraps with *any* cross-section shape in the universe.. the reason i went with a diamond was simply to reduce the number of faces that would have to be rendered... i figured that the metal portion of (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) If there's any problem with the parts I've done, just tell me and I'll fix them but as Jeff said they line up correctly, the only problem could be the orientation. Leonardo (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) all (...) to (...) Okie Dokie. I wasn't sure if there was anything being done on the subject. ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
