 | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Steve Bliss
|
| | | On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 01:16:53 GMT, "Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote: Sorry to follow-up on my own message, but would this format be acceptable to everyone: 0 1999-01-01 SEB Minor corrections I think that date format will be (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, if the date format is yyyy-mm-dd. :) /Tore (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Sorry I wasn't clear enough. 0 1999-12-31 SEB Minor corrections Is that better? :) Steve (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | (...) Yes. I presume it is supposed to be the ISO format (yyyy-mm-dd). (...) Not that I know of. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, it is supposed to by yyyy-mm-dd. No, it isn't supposed to be an/the ISO format. I'm glad it is, though. (...) Good -- then no one will be confused. Steve (25 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Benoit Cerrina
|
| | | | (...) Yes Japan does, However since it is always confusing when numbered dates are used I would suggest 1999-jan-01 which is unmistakable. (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Since Japan uses y-d-m, then the TLA month would be better. Steve (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | Benoit: (...) I have always believed that Japan uses a year-month-day date format. Are you sure? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | (...) I can speak on this. Japan uses either y-d-m or d-m-y in modern forms. Traditionally (and still in some traditional circles) the Year is expressed in reference to the current ruling emperor, so the year that I was there (1996) was actually (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Benoit Cerrina
|
| | | | | | You are both right I actually meant that, since the date expressed in the example (ISO) was year month day I wasn't carefull enough when I read the other message. I don't know of a country which uses year day month. By the way I so what your talking (...) (25 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea —Benoit Cerrina
|
| | | | Sorry cancel that I didn't read it carefully enough Japan uses Year Month Day Benoit a écrit dans le message ... (...) are (...) (25 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
