 | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
onyx wrote in message ... (...) tile (...) went (...) RL (...) LDraw (...) to be Onyx, You may disagree, but you restate my own objection perfectly. Your example of 3068 is "perfect" "as far as I'm concerned". It shows your personal standards and (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [ldraw.org] multilanguage support (was Re: Multilanguage support for ldraw.org)
|
|
(...) At the page bottoms I only feel it is appropriate to show up to 5 language links, there could be an expandable language page or popup that activates when clicked though, to give the full options. (...) No problem. From what you have told me (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
(...) Wheaton College which is literally down the street from me offers student discounts on software. I grabbed Photoshop 4 for $230 several years back and a former employer bought me the upgrade to 5. Thanks for the suggestion, I will download it (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
|
Tim: [...] (...) Does it work in X? (...) <URL:(URL) [...] [ Using Apache to handle multiple languages. ] (...) You get a translated page if it is translated, otherwise you get an English one. Your suggestion means that you get nothing if people get (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Multilanguage support for ldraw.org (Was: Re: Ldraw.org...)
|
|
Tim: (...) [...] (...) If we use the Apache approach to handle languages there shouldn't be any limits to how many languages we can handle (we can always include hard-coded links to other languages at the bottom of the pages). (...) I wouldn't mind (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
|
Tim: (...) I haven't got any of these for Netscape and I run lynx with a plain sans serif fixed width font I don't know the name of. :-) And lynx is just another browser. I am using version 2.8.1pre.9 (10 Oct 1998). You can find information about (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: narts posted to cad.dat`
|
|
(...) All I can say is, before you send _any_ parts (or narts), you should look at each and every one with a HYPERCRITICAL eye. If you note any flaws, don't send it. If people here on lugnet have noted flaws fix them, or don't send. Do NOT assume a (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 w/ pattern, technic pin long w/ bush
|
|
(...) Jonathan, whether you understand what the complaints are about or not, just take it on faith that this part is _wrong_. As someone else said, if you would get this piece and actually look at it, you would clearly see the flaws. Right now, (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
|
(...) That is sort of the de-facto "standard". Jorge Gonzalez (1) used this method for the sets he did, as have others. -- Terry K -- 1. Pretty sure it was JG. JG, sorry if I misspelled your name. (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) sorry roy, but i have to disagree with you here... take a look at the 1x2 tile (3068)... simple, elegant, and as far as i'm concerned (especially after i went back and personally put in the bottom groove) it is *perfect*.. true, there isn't (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
