 | | Re: Colour for conducting parts (Was: Studs)
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: dinsdag 30 maart 1999 18:19 Subject: Colour for conducting parts (Was: Studs) Jacob, thank you for the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) [...] (...) :-( What about L2P and LDLite? (Haven't got them running here) Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Colour for conducting parts (Was: Studs)
|
|
Manfred: (...) I may have worded it too strongly when I wrote "decided", but I have appended the relevant messages from L-CAD, so you can decide for yourself. Play well, Jacob PS: Could everybody please check the colour section in the FAQ and tell (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) Guess what, L3P does not render them chrome, but yellow (not even gold!). Laurentino Martins [mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt] [(URL) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
-----Original mesage----- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: dinsdag 30 maart 1999 15:01 Subject: Re: Studs (...) I have failed to notice this decision. I was not the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) It's not an issue for the primitives committee, because there are electric contacts in parts as well as in primitives. I'm not against changing the color to a grey-shade, but I'm not unhappy with the current standard. Steve (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw/CAD links
|
|
Todd: (...) [...] (...) in "amter" (counties?) and then in major cities. That's fine, but you might want to fix the names. - Nordjylland (Fredrikshavn, Ålborg?) - Vestjylland (Ribe) - Østjylland (Århus, Billund?) - Sønderjylland (Sønderborg, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
(...) Until now, no one has paid much attention to the idea of having these keywords around. I agree with you completely, but it's a chicken-and-egg problem. Until we've got software to support using the CATEGORY entries, we can't depend on them. (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Inv DB (was: Star Wars Elements)
|
|
(...) Hmm. Let me add just a couple of bells and whistles, to make it more usable (and to document-by-example). The db is actually my tool[1] for writing LEGO set inventories. Part-lookup is just one important aspect of this activity. Steve -- 1-For (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
Ahh. Everyone, assume I canceled my reply to jonathan just before this. Well, it will probably show up below this posting in the threaded-view. Hmmm. I don't have the new green roadplates, so I don't know if they are the same as the previous 7-stud (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
