 | | Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
|
|
(...) Hmm. I interpret this like the lawyer's question, "Is that when you stopped beating your wife?" It's not really yes or no. The totally accurate answer is: there are no 2D objects in LDraw. The polygons we model are just the 2D surfaces of 3D (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw History - here's one for the old timers in the group....
|
|
(...) I started working on it in June 96, at that time I had my own set of bricks all hardcoded into the program but a few months later (don't ask me when) I asked James if I could use his .DAT files in LeoCAD and converted them to my own format. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw History - here's one for the old timers in the group....
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <bram@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:MABBIBJJFOJIOHD...wru.edu... (...) Heheh... (...) Added that you intro'ed the tutorial in Sept 98 (and I will link to it). Snipped cool history tidbits on LDraw/LEdit. (...) It would be neat if (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
|
|
WARNING "6260.dat" Line 7: Row 1 all zeros: & 1 16 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4edge.dat Does this mean that we are forced to incorrectly turn 2D objects into quasi-3D to make them pass the tests? /Tore (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker Activity Page
|
|
(XPOST lugnet.cad, FUT lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) One of the usability challenges I've been having with the new Parts Tracker is knowing what's been going on. There are about 360 active files now[1], and it's hard to see new files and reviews being (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Number of parts?
|
|
1589 not counting subparts and primitives. Leonardo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:34 AM Subject: Number of parts? (...) or (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Number of parts?
|
|
Do we have an official tally of the number of official parts in the LCad library? I would include the multitude of official torsos and decorated elements, but I'm not as curious about the number of official primitives or subparts. Any info will help (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug reports
|
|
(...) Well, one could think of the orthographic projection as a perspective projection seen from an infinite distance through a telephoto lense (at least that's the way I think of it). I'm not sure that helps me come up with unified coordinate (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug reports
|
|
Don: (...) The tiling works fine, but it is extremely slow compared to rendering the whole image in one piece. (...) Those notes are quite easy to understand once you find them. ----- (...) Considering that we are considering parallel projections, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug reports
|
|
(...) Wow! Lots of bugs reports all at once. Where do I start? I don't know what's up with xvfb the aspect ratio problem. It seems odd since you can reshape an ldglite window and the aspect ratio is handled correctly. I guess I'll have to get xvfb (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
