 | | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) AFAIK, TLG hasn't said anything officially regarding LDraw or its parts libraries. I believe LDraw as a freeware program is well within its rights to contain SW elements as well. They aren't making official statements about it (IMO) because (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I meant to say "no point _for_me_ to discuss anymore". Sorry for sounding harsh. (...) I still don't agree. But as I said (or rather meant to say, English isn't my primary language, so I sometimes goof) we probably don't need to discuss this (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I only used eight, to simplify the drawing, which was made by hand. (...) All I say is that the benefits from it overweight the extra effort. (...) Correct, Can't argue with that ! But this problem surfaces, due to the intrinsic polygonized (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with 1-4con1.dat
|
|
(...) I am using the color definitions from Anton's Lego library and these are the closest to real Lego colors i have seen. The only exception is black and transparent black that should be <0.2,0.2,0.2> Georg (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
What is the official view of lego on the ldraw rendering program and parts library? Does TLG have anything to say about the library? Is there anything that TLG would like us not to make and put into the library (e.g. some of the "star wars (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) LDraw code? With a circular shape having 16 segments, not eight as in your diagrams. If you think that is simpler for the parts authors (or that it requires a "tiny extra effort") as compared to superimposing a quad and a disc (two lines of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
Hi, I've been working a bit with flexible hoses lately, and I've noticed an odd thing about the parts which make up the bent version of the 8.5L flexible hose. The part 754.dat (URL) used as a hose segment, about 50 of them go into a single hose. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) Auch, another error? Thank you, Lars, I'll fix it and send it to Steve Bliss, hopefully making it to the next update. Fredrik (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Help for povray needed!
|
|
(...) <SNIP> Thanks, this helps a lot, but now there is one problem left: MLCad first creates the dat file to be converted, than calls L3P to convert it into pov and than it executes pov-ray with the above statement. If you do that for multiple (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | L3Lab and BFC
|
|
I have been very busy for the past weeks (tearing down a brick fireplace (real bricks :-) and a 20 feet chimney, painting ceilings and walls, the Sping has really put ideas into my wife's head :-), but last night I finally got some time for myself. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote on April 6th... (...) The program should refuse to certify a part if not all subfiles are certified. (...) Agreed! We should not put any constraints on the authors. They may scale/rotate/mirror primitives as they wish (not (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Performance Improvement
|
|
Damien Duquennoy wrote... (...) L3Lab draws a quad as two triangles. You can see this yourself, when you turn off dither-transparency and use true transparency. Because the two triangles share a side, the quad-division line gets drawn twice and is (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with BFC
|
|
Damien Duquennoy wrote... (...) Your parts renders OK in L3Lab with BFC enabled. /Lars (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
Chris Dee wrote... (...) "L3P -check" has always been able to spot singular matrices, simply because POV cannot handle them. L3Lab uses the same file parser as L3P (which BTW is public available in ldglite). However, L3Lab could easily render edge (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote... (...) Running "l3p -check" (checks all DAT's in P and PARTS) revals: SKIPPING "4285.DAT" Line 981: Singular matrix: 1 16 10 4 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1-4cyli.dat SKIPPING "6043.DAT" Line 17: Singular matrix: 1 16 0 20 -16 8 0 0 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: open source & inventory ?
|
|
Jonathan Wilson wrote... (...) Don Heyse has published source for ldglite, an OpenGL extension of ldlite for Windows/Linux/Mac using L3 parser/viewer at (URL) Zide has published the source for LeoCAD, see (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with 1-4con1.dat
|
|
John VanZwieten wrote... (...) Yes, already made. I just need to update the colors. BTW, what is the LDraw color for the smoke-colored transparent SW cockpit (32?), and does anyone have a good POV color for it? /Lars (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
Thanks Steve for your great work. Beside the 476 bow-ties, the next L3P version would like to comment: WARNING "X44.DAT" Line 127: Identical to line 40: 5 24 0 -7 -6 0 -9 -7 2.68 -6.47 -6 -2.68 -6.47 -6 WARNING "X44.DAT" Line 142: Identical to line (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
