 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) True, but it's also a precedent. I'd rather have the bottom surface than curved edges. I'd consider a part with all surfaces more accurate than a part with closely-modeled upper surfaces, but the underside completely missing. Maybe I'm just (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball pattern
|
|
(...) Seems like there should be a soccer-ball tessalation[1] somewhere on the web, which could be ported to LDraw relatively easily. Steve [1] May be a mis-use of the term -- not sure of the limits on tessalations. (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball name
|
|
(...) Yes, but you didn't have a LEGO set for your team. :-P Unless those unconfirmed rumors were true. Nah, Matt would have had some by now... Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) In this case, all the tile elements probably have new, 5-digit part numbers. It would be appropriate to use these numbers for new versions of the tile. In general, if TLG modifies a part but retains the original part number, appending a letter (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
(...) An online database isn't going to completely address your two issues -- missing parts and parts which haven't been created. Typically, parts will be missing from a model either because (a) the parts aren't made yet (and it's actually problem (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) Well, as I said, there's a draft at (URL) specifically, here's the DAT-file, and a GIF image (2 URLs) not finished, but I may or may not finish it in some time. Also, I'm not too sure that I have used the best orientation. The orientation of (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
i do not have 8880. i d/led the instructions from kl.net. also fredric can you please make the dk grey offset crank? a placeholder would do but i realy want this part. (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) Maybe you could add an option to move a part from the request list to the parts tracker. When someone starts to work on a part from the request list instead of adding a new entry, the person would just modify the existing entry and the script (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) This is already done: "6540.DAT Technic Steering Arm Large" Note that the version drawn has a cross axle hole, while your 8880 may have a normal Technic hole in this part. This part came in two versions, where the first one had the cross axle (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) Yes, I'm working on those. But work progress is slow. I have drafts for 2852 Technic Connecting Rod 2853 Technic Crankshaft 2854 Technic Crankshaft Centre at the website (URL) planning to finish off these by some time, but don't hold your (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | VOTING now working
|
|
Hey all, Thanks to Todd "what would we do without him?" Lehman, the parts vote is back up and running. :-) (URL) to be safe, you should Refresh/Reload on your browser to make sure you don't use a cached copy of the voting page. If you think you have (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) get (...) find (...) I (...) completed, (...) update a (...) Oh I see your point now. No, I don't think there is a way to do this. I vaguely recall Zachary pointing this out when he first put the "Requested Parts Page" up. I agree this would (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts wanted
|
|
(...) 6542.dat? is that the one you mean? (...) Hopefully, Onyx will get these done. (...) I believe those are on the way. By Fredrik. He just submitted the Technic round piston, and is working on the other engine parts. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | parts wanted
|
|
does anyone have the folowing parts? 8880 supercar blue suspension arms 8880 supercar gear shift center pieces 8880 supercar gear shift dk grey gears 8880 supercar white suspension arms 8880 supercar gear stick and shift plate large shock absorbers (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) OK, well, I know how to update a part on the Parts Tracker Page, but I can't find any way to remove a part from the "Requested Parts" Page. I'm asking because I would be happy to clean up the parts that I requested that have been completed, (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) have (...) There is no automation - it is the author's responsibility to move a part to completed when it's submitted, and remove it when the update is released. Chris Dee (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Soccer ball name
|
|
(...) I only get the one copy -- the one you e-mail to me (assuming it makes it to me OK, which is highly probable but not guaranteed). I also see a copy of the article you posted when I read via NNTP. If I were reading lugnet.cad.dev via e-mail (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is the Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) Thanks! I couldn't find it. Anyway, when does the requested parts list get updated? Isn't it supposed to automatically update "requested" parts that have been completed? --Karim (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
If I use Java 2 I can use the latest API's with it. Because of the Java plugin that Sun produces, a browser can have that installed and always have the most up to date Java implementation. This is especially important since Netscape is no longer (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
I've never authored lego parts for ldraw, but I did for pov-ray (at the time I was using Anton Raves library which is very good (a lot more detailed than ldraw, I haven't tried l3P so I don't know the quality of the output) but it was lacking some (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
