 | | Re: Voting page 9905
|
|
(...) movement (...) I've already found a problem: The "Baseplate 32 x 32 Service Station with Pattern" (309p01) should have the same color lines as the 9-stud roadways. Jeff (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 1-4cone1.dat
|
|
This should be 1-4con1.dat. And all files should have a final 0 line. Steve (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905
|
|
(...) vote early and often. ;) (...) Note to Karim: the reason your name is on 1-4con10.dat is because I had thrown that file together on my system awhile ago, but then I got confused about which files you had posted, and I was trying to be sure you (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
On Wed, 26 May 1999 06:18:52 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote: [snip] (...) Hmm. Did you mean 'skoash' or 'skoosh'? Seriously, it sounds fine to me. Steve (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: what has happened to these parts?
|
|
(...) my brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern was very similar to 3004p06.dat brick 1 x 2 with black grille pattern. however the p06 used rect.dat which gave a 24 colored edge around the black stripes. also my ferry windows stripes were more (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | what has happened to these parts?
|
|
why have these parts not been released for voting yet? the technic flexable hoses brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern slope brick 18 4 x 2 slope brick 65 6 x 6 x 2 quad inverted with cutouts shock absorber 1 x 2 x 2 (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
|
(...) I migth have a go at this piece, it has number 30360 embossed in it. But I'm not starting right now. And although I'm aware that most of you are desparately in need for this part, I strongly believe that this part needs some of the new (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How do you know the numbers?
|
|
I'm a bit puzzled. How do you guys know that the Technic Axle #5 has number 32073 (off my memory) and that the Technic Connector with Axlehole has number 32039? As far as I can see, these numbers are not printed on the parts. Do you have a spy (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Voting page 9905
|
|
Padewans, Voting for update 9905 commences: (URL) that 4 unapproved primitives are include for the cone 3x3x2 piece. (The 3x3x2 cone! Finally! I've been doing that Jedi mind-control hand movement in Steve's direction for *months* - guess it finally (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed primitive for notched round surface
|
|
Sorry Taskforce, I've made a crucial typing error in my answer to a mail from Lars yesterday. In the second part of the answer to his question: (...) "I believe that in this case a 1-4cyli primitive rotated over 45 degrees covers the inner wall (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) The "best" orientation for many parts is debatable, and usually easy enough to change when modelling. Especially on baseplates. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Yes, the consensus. That is the tough part. I do think that, whichever way we decide to go, that the cross-section should have a little more roundness to it. The output in POV-Ray is proof of that. OK people, how about this: Manfreds (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4ring3 [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4ring3.dat 0 Name: 1-4ring3.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official Primitive 4 16 3 0 0 2.772 0 1.148 3.696 0 1.531 4 0 0 4 16 2.772 0 1.148 2.121 0 2.121 2.828 0 2.828 3.696 0 1.531 4 16 2.121 0 2.121 1.148 0 2.772 1.531 0 3.696 2.828 0 2.828 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4rin10 [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4rin10.dat 0 Name: 1-4rin10.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official 4 16 10 0 0 9.239 0 3.827 10.163 0 4.21 11 0 0 4 16 9.239 0 3.827 7.071 0 7.071 7.778 0 7.778 10.163 0 4.21 4 16 7.071 0 7.071 3.827 0 9.239 4.21 0 10.163 7.778 0 7.778 4 16 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4cone1.dat [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4cone1.dat 0 Name: 1-4cone1.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official 5 16 0 1 1 0 0 2 -0.765 0 1.848 0.765 0 1.848 5 16 0.383 1 0.924 0.765 0 1.848 0 0 2 1.414 0 1.414 5 16 0.707 1 0.707 1.414 0 1.414 0.765 0 1.848 1.848 0 0.765 5 16 0.924 1 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to Primitives Committee:
|
|
(...) I'll work on these fixes and repost tonight. --Karim (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
Parts Authors: don't forget to update the Parts Tracker pages. Please mark your parts which are in the LCAD9904 update (and don't need more work). I have to post these reminders as penance for continually forgetting to do my updates. Steve LDraw (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where should I center this one?
|
|
(...) Whoops, you're right. But, in the case of the 1x2 plates and bricks, the centerpoint is on level with the top of a plane, and on the rectangular lattice formed by the studs. As for the 2x5 and 2x9 hinge plates, these are a real exception. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to Primitives Committee:
|
|
(...) Quick update: I'm in favor of these files (I need one of them for the 3x3x2 cone!) Last night, I asked the other members of the committee for feedback. Some corrections are needed on these files: 1. They should each have a standard header. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) it would be no problem to model the coils/wraps with *any* cross-section shape in the universe.. the reason i went with a diamond was simply to reduce the number of faces that would have to be rendered... i figured that the metal portion of (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
