|  |  | Re: How big is your VEC dir? 
 | 
 | 
| Ya gotta love that logic. :-) -- Terry K -- (...)    (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: How big is your VEC dir? 
 | 
 | 
| Hmmm. A 6.4 GB drive is $124 at Fry's today, for a cost of roughly $0.01 USD per 0.5 MB. If we assume this option saves 22 MB for each of the 500 LDLite users, the net savings to the entire world will amount to $220, which is probably worth an hour (...)   (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts) 
 | 
 | 
| (...) wrote: (...) 9326-4t.dat (...) is (...) Sure, go ahead if you have the time, or let me know if you'd prefer me to fix them. I didn't realise these were still in need of work - were these the early ones I did where I painted the decoration at (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Ah, cool. I hadn't noticed that application. Kind of wobbly, but it works. (...) I'm sure your meas-timates are at least as good as mine, so it's not worth re-doing all of your work. (...) That's how I would have done it. Not much fun. (...) (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <371a91f5.3600445@lu...et.com>... (...) Excellent, then I think the gap in the bottom should be drawn. I could be used to mount the cannon on an antenna or other 8 ldu width rod. (...) I meas-timated the radii as 4.5 (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: [Newpart] - #2871, Electric Train  9V Motor Decorative Side 
 | 
 | 
| -----Original message----- From: jonathan wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> To: lugnet.cad@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad@lugnet.com>; lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zaterdag 17 april 1999 1:18 Subject: Re: [Newpart] - #2871, (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | RE: [ldraw.org] L3P Question 
 | 
 | 
| Terry Keller wrote on Saturday, April 17, 1999: (...) Well, it tells you the extent and position of the model, which I find indispensable when trying to place several models in a scene. /Lars    (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | RE: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| John VanZwieten wrote on Saturday, April 17, 1999: (...) I (...) the (...) All 3 cone primitives (4-4con12.dat, 1-4con3.dat, 1-4con4.dat) have POV equivalents in L3P. Unfortunately in v1.1 the 1-4 cones are clipped by a too small box, (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I believe the newest L3P is totally up-to-date on primitive substitutions, but the previous did not substitute all cones. BTW, which cones did you use? I meas-timated the radii as 5 and 9, so the existing conic primitives don't fit very well. (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts) 
 | 
 | 
| (...) And I will take care of the back-sides as well. Chris, is it OK with you if I finish the detailing of the two torsos (dungarees and BT2, I think) that reference 9326.dat, instead of 9326-4t.dat? They both need to have the undecorated surface (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 |