To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / *12846 (-20)
  Re: April Model and Scene of the Month Contest Winners
 
(...) Err, I forget. How do we look at them if we've already voted? Thanks, Don (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: April Model and Scene of the Month Contest Winners
 
(...) Being a broadband user, I tend to prefer bigger, but I can also understand that this would lead to an uncomfortably long page load time for people who don't have broadband. To be perfectly honest, all the models this month are big enough in (...) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: April Model and Scene of the Month Contest Winners
 
(...) Hmm, I forgot to make the links and tables borderless. I'll make a mental note of that for next month's contest (...) I thought about this. I foresaw a potential problem with only one picture displayed: people who vote for a model who don't (...) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: April Model and Scene of the Month Contest Winners
 
(...) IMO there's not much to criticize. But as you're asking ... Maybe ... ... the models should not go all the way to the edges of the thumbnails, now that there are black borders? ... the black border should be blue, just like all other links? (...) (20 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: April Model and Scene of the Month Contest Winners
 
(...) Excellent. Nice clear views at a good angle. The orthographic camera is fine, although I wouldn't object to a little bit of perspective, and the outlining of the bricks gives a good indication of construction technique. All up, a big (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: April Model and Scene of the Month Contest Winners
 
(...) I'd like to solicit any critiques regarding the batch of renderings for May's MOTM contest. Thanks. -Orion (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Lsynth thoughts.
 
(...) Yes, the hose color is specified in the LSYTH BEGIN line. I like the new constraint. I'm in favor of it replacing the original LS00.DAT. (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Lsynth thoughts.
 
(...) Oh yeah, before I forget. I hardcoded the transparent white just to illustrate the axis and the bullseye inside the part. I really think it should be coded in color 16. Then when used, it should be inserted with any transparent color. That way (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Patterns, simplified
 
(...) I'm inferring that you are talking about converting a scanned image into a pattered subfile for a part? Then, optimally, the process requires the following discrete phases: 1) Someone[1] scans a patterned part at high resolution into an agreed (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)  
 
  Re: Patterns suck!
 
(...) I'm gonna have to look into this again. Vectorizers are cool. Here's some more opensource code (3 URLs) a really nifty description of how to use the potrace vectorizer to generate edges, and the netlib triangulator to create the triangles. (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Patterns suck!
 
(...) Or you could search the net for vectorizer programs like this one. (URL) a free vectorizer with source code. (URL) wonder how hard it would be to modify it to handle color and output ldraw format. Enjoy, Don (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Lsynth thoughts.
 
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> wrote in message news:Hx5nw4.JoA@lugnet.com... (...) Looks good. Jennifer (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Lsynth thoughts.  [DAT]
 
(...) I envision something more like this. 0 ~LSYNTH constraint part 0 Name: lz00.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten, Steve Bliss, Kevin Clague, Paul Easter, Don Heyse 0 Unofficial LCad Part 0 CATEGORY Hose 0 1999-05-02 KevinB Added nipple (taken from (...) (20 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technical Issues Resolved for Steering Committee Ballot
 
Got in and voted late Saturday. Thanks all! Darrell (20 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Technical Issues Resolved for Steering Committee Ballot
 
(...) I like to note that if you are still having problems accessing the poll, even after waiting 20-30 min and logging out and back in, then contact me directly at the email address listed above. I'll work to fix your problem a quickly as I can. (...) (20 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Technical Issues Resolved for Steering Committee Ballot
 
(...) The best thing to do here is to try again later. The site does not add you to the 'members' group immediately upon joining, it's on a cycle. So, try again about 30 mins later (or longer) and you should be able to vote. -Tim (20 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Technical Issues Resolved for Steering Committee Ballot
 
(...) I am now told the footnote has been re-added after somehow it went missing. Thanks, Orion. -Tim (20 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  April Model and Scene of the Month Contest Winners
 
Congratulations to the winners of the March Model/Scene of the Month contests: (URL) MOTM, Jorgen Andersson, Volkswagen Typ 82 "Kübelwagen"> (URL) SOTM, Robert Leahey, Perspectives 2 - Making Orbit> Voting for May's contests in is now open This (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
 
  Re: Technical Issues Resolved for Steering Committee Ballot
 
(...) I just recently signed up for an account - around the 17th - as I was considering posting some stl2dat converted stuff to the PT. Just filled out the form today, though. I can login and access my profile, and I was shown the "thanks for (...) (20 years ago, 1-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Technical Issues Resolved for Steering Committee Ballot
 
(...) OK. (...) There should be a footnote at the bottom. It's in compliance with the bylaws provision that requires notification of employees of the LEGO company on the ballot. It was there in instances of the ballot I've seen, since I have already (...) (20 years ago, 1-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR