 | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) I would not tell anyone anything like that. The question really isn't whether or not the *parts* can be improved. A better question would be: are you able to improve them? Part of the answer to that depends on your ability to work as part of (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) I can't speak for anyone else, but I know when to duck. ;) Seriously, I think I was one of the first to point out problems with part-files you had submitted. At least, I was the first during a part-voting review cycle. As for the most-recent (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [Newpart] - Sneak preview of #2871, Electric Train 9V Motor Decorative Side
|
|
Hello all, On lugnet.cad.dat I've posted a sneak preview of part #2871 I'm working on now. It not complete yet, I still have to do the interior and the small details at the backside of the bead that is in the middle of the part. But it is finished (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
(...) My suggestion: worry about content and delivery before worrying about spice. LDraw.org should be approachable: easy to access, easy to understand, work on the maximum number of browsers. Using Shockwave to deliver content might improve some (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
Have the program transform all parts to 99.99% of their actual size. (Just a random suggestion :-) -John Van Leonardo Zide wrote in message <3711E2FA.17EB08D@ce...com.br>... (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
Tim, Please, please, please, please, please, please, please do *NOT* rely on Shockwave plugins to access content on the new site. IMO, this is far worse than image maps, because, in essence, it is forcing people to stick to one piece of buggy (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) I'd say the bar should be set at whatever level that the majority of the part authors and other longtime users think it should be set. If that is an unreasonable level... well, tough. (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 5 april 1999 15:51 Subject: Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read) (...) I failed to notice (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Dimensions of the parts
|
|
Hi, I've been trying to add collision detection to LeoCAD but I'm stuck with a problem and would like to know if anyone has a good solution. Take for example 2 1x1 bricks and position them side by side, they will always be touching each other (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
onyx wrote in message ... (...) tile (...) went (...) RL (...) LDraw (...) to be Onyx, You may disagree, but you restate my own objection perfectly. Your example of 3068 is "perfect" "as far as I'm concerned". It shows your personal standards and (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
