 | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list to a group on the NNTP server. Dan (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I would rephrase that... under the most prevalent current limitation scheme being floated, (LSC eligible==LSC voting eligible) you would not be able to, and I would barely squeak by. Certainly other schemes could be floated, with different (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up. In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe an address (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only
|
|
(...) If it's the current version of Mesa (5.0.1), and it's been configured with the correct ./configure switches, then no, I don't see why using a symlink would cause any problems. Anyhow, I just patched things up to work with the latest sources. (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only
|
|
(...) I had done that (I thought). And now I have done it again. Same result. I suppose I should admit that I cheated a little bit, and just used a symlink to the directory containing Mesa (to keep my directory structure clean). But is there any (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
(...) Or more likely, (since I just got the same result myself) is that I created the stubs and the new makefile for the stock 0.9.5 sources instead of the latest CVS sources since that's what I had lying around. Apparently I need a few more stubs (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
(...) I only glanced at the list of errors, but maybe this is the problem. If you already built ldglite then you have to start over from scratch with the new makefile. Unfortunately my makefile skills are not the best. There's no "make clean". So (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
(...) [...] (...) I should probably have written that it is on a Red Hat (mostly) 7.3 system with some kind of x86 processor. Play well, Jacob -- City X'ers mail van (building instructions): (URL) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.cad.dev ] (...) So far it works fine, but ... (...) This fails. Here's the end of the output from the build: ---...--- gcc -g -DUNIX -DUSE_OPENGL -DUSE_L3_PARSER -DUSE_BMP8 -DNEED_MIN_MAX -DUSE_PNG -DTILE_RENDER_OPTION -DOSMESA_OPTION (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
