 | | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Hopefully the latter. I did not intend to have any condescending tone in there at all! I'm talking about appropriate process. If you read it in there I must not have done a very good job of communicating and I apologise. Either that or you're (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Actually your (and any other non-LSC member's) input is not wothless and actually has a great influence on what decides. We decided when the LSC first formed that we wouldn't do anything without at least discussing the pros and cons with the (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Yeah, I got the blinking error message in preview and still posted it. I couldn't figure out the problem. Sorry, It must be the .bmp thing. I didn't think of that because they were only 8k apiece, but I can see why you'd want to avoid the (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote: (switched to plain text for clarity) Don, I don't think your FTX image embed worked. Did it work when you used preview (you DID use preview, I am sure)? If it did, there's a technical problem somewhere... (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Sorry I'm a bit late to the party (been on vacation) but I think you should submit it. It looks good enough for me. Actually I think it's too good not to submit. Compare your part (as seen in LDRAW): (URL) And this official part (as seen in (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
|
|
(...) Yes, yes it is. :) (...) Good to know. Maybe I should start a "free to a good home" list of links on the l.c.d.parts sidebar... (...) Heh. I thought about that, too. Give each piece a vector (speed and direction) based on the centerpoint of (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote: at RANDOM I've chosen: (...) Sure is a pretty part though, isn't it :-) The last thing I would want to do is keep such a beautiful, high-quality part from reaching its full potential and graduating to (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
|
|
(...) Making posts like this is a good idea. More communication. :) (...) Definitely don't just update somebody's part without saying something. Emails only take a moment to send. (...) 3-4 months is a long time to wait for a reply to an email. How (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
|
|
(...) I think the method we currently use is good: Make all reasonable efforts to contact the author. If the author doesn't reply after a reasonable period of time (3-4 months is good) then make the fixes needed. Also, many held parts are known to (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
|
|
(...) Yes, I think that sounds like a good idea. The Contributor Agreement we are putting in place addresses taking over orphans inasmuch as authors agree that LDraw.org has: " - The right to create derivative works of the Work" That covers it I (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
